### What this PR does / why we need it?
mooncake connector support external dp & update readme
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request removes the redundant parameters `gamma1` and `beta1`
(also named `gamma0`/`beta0` in some places) from the `mla_preprocess`
kernel and its calling hierarchy. The changes are consistent across C++
kernel code, bindings, and Python call sites. The parameters were unused
in the lower-level functions, so their removal is a good cleanup.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The python interface of the kernel is affected, and the params of
`gamma0` and `beta0` are not needed.
### How was this patch tested?
The unit-test of the kernel is adapted accordingly.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: mojave2 <chenchen145@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Disables `FULL_DECODE_ONLY` end-to-end test that fails intermittently.
This prevents CI blockages while the root cause of the flakiness is
investigated.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
None needed.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove test cases containing CPU incompatible operators
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, in the piecewise of aclgraph, the model will be in eagle mode
in attention, which will cause abnormal allreduce latency of O matrix.
The reason is that cpu resources will be preempted in eagle mode. So I
hope to temporarily add cpu binding to vllm-ascend.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: GDzhu1 <809721801@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The `force_attention` parameter is designed for flash infer kernel
warmup, we don't actually need it on Ascend device (at least for
now).And it tends to make things more complicated. So we replace the
`force_attention` parameter with `aclgraph_runtime_mode` in the
attention metadata creation logic.
This change makes the control flow more explicit by directly using the
graph runtime mode to determine how to build attention metadata, rather
than relying on an intermediate boolean flag. This simplification
removes redundant logic and clarifies the conditions for building
attention metadata for full decode graph mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
DP + `FULL_DECODE_ONLY` + online serving.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Added shared memory size option to Docker run command.If shm-size is not
specified, docker will use 64MB by default. In this case,
vllm:EngineCore process may coredump if workload is high.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Done
Closes: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/3513
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: likeful <irayki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: leijie2015 <irayki@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts commit 646c1db5d7.
this new ops may lead accuracy problem
### What this PR does / why we need it?
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Port #1916 and #2157 to master branch to fuse operators in deepseek moe
layers, which can reduce scheduling overhead on devices. Note that this
feature is valid only when `tp_size = 1` and
`multistream_overlap_shared_expert` is enabled with torchair graph mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Users can enable this feature with `--additional-config
'{"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true, "enable_super_kernel":true},
"multistream_overlap_shared_expert":true}'`.
### How was this patch tested?
E2E deepseek serving with 2P1D disaggregated prefill scenarios.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add new accuracy test case Deepseek-V2-Lite-W8A8 for aclgraph
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
ut
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
v_proj combining transpose and matmul
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: GDzhu1 <809721801@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Using non-blocking operations for device-to-host transfers can lead to
data corruption in later steps. The CPU tensor is accessed right after
the transfer is triggered, but the transfer might not be complete yet.
As a result, the data could be wrong. This problem was seen in the A3
environment during `profile_run`.
### How was this patch tested?
CI pass.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
fix skip ut test and enable ut test run normally
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
This PR deletes model codes of deepseek_v2 and deepseek_v3 to reuse the
model file from vLLM.
vLLM Ascend now uses custom ops register way instead of model file
hard-coding.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Update the check logic of reinitializing inputbatch, this is a follow-up
pr of #3477. `kernel_block_sizes` is a `list[list[int]]` and the
original logic will always update `InputBatch` when using hybrid blocks,
this pr fixes that
### How was this patch tested?
locally test with qwen3-next
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Seperate deepseek v3.2 modeling form deepseek v2
### How was this patch tested?
- CI passed with existing test.
- test deepseek v3.2 locally
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix attn_group initialization timing so that fix qwen3-next model
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adds the first aisbench case for nightly test, it lays a
foundation for following performance and accuracy tests in nightly test.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running the test
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: jiangyunfan1 <jiangyunfan1@h-partners.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add new npu_fused_infer_attention_score op to improve perfomance in
flash attention case.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: ZYang6263 <zy626375@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
when using dynamic eplb, patch v1 executor to avoid create child process
failed.
### How was this patch tested?
deepseek in v3.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Optimize torchair kv_consumer padding logic. Only pad when it is spec
decoding
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: xuyexiong <xuyexiong@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR is aimed to fix the recomputing out of memory bug in decode
instance. When recomputing happens in decode, kv cache usage may exceed
the pre-allocated memory, and it will cause OOM.
So we propose a new scheduling strategy, when decode instance cannot
allocate new block for running requests, we will stop the request that
will be preempted. These stopped request will be recognied by proxy, and
they will be send to prefill instance again to calculate kvc and then
direct to decode instance.
This is a temporary plan to fix the bug. The long-term stratege is to
use CPU offload in decode instance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
An extra ascend configuration option **-- recompute_scheduler_enable =
True** is added to enable this strategy. The default value is False
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: CHEN <116010019@link.cuhk.edu.cn>
This PR adds support for redundant experts in the EPLB.
Key points:
- Use global_num_experts = num_experts + num_redundant_experts
consistently.
- Backward compatible when num_redundant_experts=0.
Tested
On a 16-rank setup (W8A8) with static EPLB and expert_map_path,
verifying router logits shape and successful requests.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: yechao237 <yechao20180411@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In memory of https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/2610 and
#3449 Fix Mtp torchair pd bug.
In the pd Disaggregation scenario, the first token of the inference
after the d node receives the kv follows the eager mode.
Fixes:
Running with MTP torchair graph mode with Prefilling Decoding
Disaggregation , if all requests processed by the D node are requests
just transmitted from the P node, it will break the torchair graph.
Reason: During PD Disaggregation , the P node only transmits the KV
cache and prompt to the D node, not the actual tokens inferred (neither
the main model tokens nor the MTP tokens are transmitted). Therefore,
the D node will treat this request as one without MTP tokens for
inference (seq_len=1).
The community does not have graph mode issues because the community's
attention has a seq_len=1 for each batch during the decode phase.
We have issues because the graph mode pads according to processing 2
tokens per request. When there are some seq_len=1 and some seq_len=2,
padding is done at the end. If all requests received by the D node are
seq_len=1, padding cannot be performed normally according to the
attention's fia operator constraints.
Solution:
The kv consumer uses extra torchair graph padding to avoid breaking FIA
graph constrains (The one this PR implemented).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: xuyexiong <xuyexiong@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to add padding logic to seq_lens、block_tables when running
in full decode scenario. Before this PR, the number of input tokens with
padding might exceeds corresponding seq_lens. For example, when running
in full decode scenario:
```
input_ids : [1, 3, 0, 0]
seq_lens: [2, 1]
query_start_loc: [0, 1, 2]
```
Here, `input_ids` is padded by 2 tokens while
`seq_lens`/`query_start_loc` are not. The mismatch between `input_ids`
and `seq_lens`/`query_start_loc` might cause some potential bugs. This
PR would change it into :
```
input_ids : [1, 3, 0, 0]
seq_lens: [2, 1, 1, 1]
query_start_loc: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: Angazenn <supperccell@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix 3 bugs in flash comm1 of Allgather
EP(https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/3334):
1. call `enable_sp()` with argument `vllm_config` trigger a lot of
warning log, this PR caches its return value.
2. `num_tokens_after_padding` should be cpu tensor as it will used as
`num_tokens_across_dp_cpu` in `DPMetadata`. It will causes may d2h copy
when running model.
3. In PD, model runner will execute `kv_connector_no_forward`，where
`num_tokens` is None
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: realliujiaxu <realliujiaxu@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Make the Full Graph mode can run with MTP.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: anon189Ty <Stari_Falcon@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, MTP Model in deepseek can not be capture in ACLGraph. This PR
is use to allow MTP to be captured in ACLGraph mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: anon189Ty <Stari_Falcon@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR revise the test cases of various features on the warehouse which
add the enablement of aclgraph to the test cases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
ut
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
shared expert dp for deepseek and deepseek_mtp, could be combined with
sp to improve performance.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: zhaozx-cn <zhaozx2116@163.com>
Co-authored-by: realliujiaxu <realliujiaxu@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The current implementation of FIA will introduce an `to_list` operation
for actual_seq_lengths_q and seq_lens，which comsumes extra time. These
operation can be moved earlier into `build` operation of attention
metadata.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: Angazenn <supperccell@163.com>
This reverts commit b0ae203e72.
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The fix is not ready yet, conflict with #3411 need to revert first. Will
fix this issue later
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Signed-off-by: xuyexiong <xuyexiong@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.qwen3 moe uses add_rms_norm_quant op instead of 'add_rms_norm op and
quant op' during quantization scene.
2.torch_npu.add_rms_norm_quant op fixed accuracy while model weights is
quantized by anti_method m4, m4 quantization is asymmetric outlier
suppression method, it will generate none-zero norm bias,
add_rms_norm_quant op updated to add this parameter to calculate.
3. add torch-npu check
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
new feature works if torch_npu version >= torch_npu-2.7.1.dev20250919
### How was this patch tested?
1.no special parameters to set, no new envs to set. new feature works if
torch_npu version >= torch_npu-2.7.1.dev20250919
2.use qwen3 moe quantization model to test ,such as
Qwen3-235B-A22B-W8A8, Qwen3-30B-A3B-W8A8,
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507-m4 (anti_method m4)
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: h30027576 <huangdong51@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Refactor the multi-machine CI use case. The purpose of this PR is to
increase the ease of adding multi-machine CI use cases, allowing
developers to add multi-machine cluster model testing use cases
(including PD separation) by simply adding a new YAML configuration
file.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
MLA and GQA use different computation logic: MLA slice batches and only
compute on the actually valid tokens. That means outer padding must be
handled carefully — the accuracy issue this PR fixes was caused by stale
data in `slot_mapping` being reused by subsequent inference steps.
So we zeros out the portion of the slot mapping tensor that is not used
by the currently scheduled tokens.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
Working on it.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes issues:
1. Solve the problem that multimodal scene cannot do weight prefetching
and throw an assertion error exception.
2. Standardize the grid_thw data type of qwen2VL to torch.int32.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
- ci & e2e
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: elilzhu <2435754260@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: zhulei (AK) <z00692222@china.huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix dockets CI for main release.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In memory of https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/2610
In the pd Disaggregation scenario, the first token of the inference
after the d node receives the kv follows the eager mode.
Fixes:
Running with MTP torchair graph mode with Prefilling Decoding
Disaggregation , if all requests processed by the D node are requests
just transmitted from the P node, it will break the torchair graph.
Reason: During PD Disaggregation , the P node only transmits the KV
cache and prompt to the D node, not the actual tokens inferred (neither
the main model tokens nor the MTP tokens are transmitted). Therefore,
the D node will treat this request as one without MTP tokens for
inference (seq_len=1).
The community does not have graph mode issues because the community's
attention has a seq_len=1 for each batch during the decode phase.
We have issues because the graph mode pads according to processing 2
tokens per request. When there are some seq_len=1 and some seq_len=2,
padding is done at the end. If all requests received by the D node are
seq_len=1, padding cannot be performed normally according to the
attention's fia operator constraints.
Solution:
The kv consumer uses extra torchair graph padding to avoid breaking FIA
graph constrains (The one this PR implemented).
The kv producer provides the correct tokens to the kv consumer, so that
our graph mode constraints are not broken, and all logic is the same as
the PD mixed deployment . Since we are using the community scheduler,
the modification requires patching the vllm scheduler, but
theoretically, performance should be better. (Maybe later )
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: xuyexiong <xuyexiong@huawei.com>
Pin version that can stable running 310I Duo to vllm-ascend v0.10.0rc1.
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Since PR #2614 310I Duo been broken. Although we are currently working
on fixing the issue with the 310I Duo being broken, there is no
confirmed timeline for a fix in the short term. To allow users to
quickly find a working version instead of going back and forth on trial
and error, this PR fixes the version in the 310I Duo guide.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NA
### How was this patch tested?
NA
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
Optimize multi-node guide: more clearer corresponding relationship
between configuration items and nodes
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Some issues caused by misunderstandings due to unclear guidance content,
for example: #3367
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NA
### How was this patch tested?
NA
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The GPQA dataset accuracy in the PD separation scenario of testing is
33.2, which does not meet the paper's requirement of 70. Resolve this
accuracy issue.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
qpqa has accuracy issues, but modifying the code can ensure the accuracy
meets the standard
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: fjw <2270923832@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Adapt deepseek-v3.2 to vllm 0.11.0, removing the useless patch.
The final goal is to remove all the patches and align the code arch to
vllm, thus we need to do the following work in next prs.
TODO:
- [x] remove patch on attention spec
- [ ] refactor the kvcache creation logic
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
1. CI passed with existing test.
2. Test pass with deepseek-v3.2-exp
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
