### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Fixes Qwen3-Next enable nz accuracy problem
---------
Signed-off-by: wxsIcey <1790571317@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
fix sleepmode level2 e2e test
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
no
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
use e2e tests
Signed-off-by: wangx700 <wangxin700@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The `force_attention` parameter is designed for flash infer kernel
warmup, we don't actually need it on Ascend device (at least for
now).And it tends to make things more complicated. So we replace the
`force_attention` parameter with `aclgraph_runtime_mode` in the
attention metadata creation logic.
This change makes the control flow more explicit by directly using the
graph runtime mode to determine how to build attention metadata, rather
than relying on an intermediate boolean flag. This simplification
removes redundant logic and clarifies the conditions for building
attention metadata for full decode graph mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
DP + `FULL_DECODE_ONLY` + online serving.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Make the Full Graph mode can run with MTP.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: anon189Ty <Stari_Falcon@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Adapt deepseek-v3.2 to vllm 0.11.0, removing the useless patch.
The final goal is to remove all the patches and align the code arch to
vllm, thus we need to do the following work in next prs.
TODO:
- [x] remove patch on attention spec
- [ ] refactor the kvcache creation logic
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
1. CI passed with existing test.
2. Test pass with deepseek-v3.2-exp
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When running DP in a non-equilibrium scenario, which means there is some
dp groups executing `dummy_run`, we need to make sure it running the
same mode as other dp, thus improving then performance in dp scenario
### How was this patch tested?
Tested by adding log in `_dummy_run`
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/releases/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
vllm-ascend support [msMonitor
](https://gitcode.com/Ascend/mstt/tree/master/msmonitor)tool to collect
performance of vllm-ascend
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
1.add env MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON；
2.user cann enable msMonitor tool by setting MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=1
before run vllm-ascend model；
3.MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON and VLLM_TORCH_PROFILER_DIR cannot both set
### How was this patch tested?
1.run vllm-ascend model while not set MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=1 or set
MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=0, model will run successfully;
2.run vllm-ascend model while set MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=1, run msMonitor
tool to collect profile data;
3.run vllm-ascend model while set MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=1 and
VLLM_TORCH_PROFILER_DIR, will raise error
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
f225ea7dd9
Signed-off-by: mei-feiyao <1332490378@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
based on the https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/23770,
fix Async scheduling and PP compatibility with DP, also fixes issue with
finished requests not being processed in async scheduling and PP cases,
and possible worker race conditions.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
544fe76b95
---------
Signed-off-by: jesse <szxfml@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
For sleep mode level 2, we discarded model both weights and kv_cache,
but the problems is: When we discard weights, we also discard some
tensors representing the model state which we called
`model.named_buffers()`, such as: `running_mean / running_var` in
BatchNorm、rope cos-sin cache ... when we update weights, but forgot to
update buffers as well, this will lead to some unknown issue
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
5963b98b46
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix UTs on register customop and warm up model
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
Co-authored-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com>
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
cc99baf14d
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Adjust the position of warm_up_atb.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
not involved
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
b23fb78623
Signed-off-by: huangxialu <huangxialu1@huawei.com>
This PR added the unit test framework to enable ut for vLLM Ascend. Unit
test runs on CPU machines. It'll be ran once lint check is passed the
same as e2e test.
For unit test, this PR created a new folder called `ut` under `tests`
module. All the test file in `ut` should keep the same with the code in
`vllm-ascend`. The file name should be start with `test_` prefix. For
example, in this PR. the `test_ascend_config.py` is added for
`ascend_config.py` test.
A new fille `worker/test_worker_v1.py` is also added as the placeholder.
This file should be the unit test for `vllm-ascend/worker/worker_v1.py`.
Additional, a new `fake_weight` folder is added, it contains the
config.json from `facebook/opt-125m`, so that the test will not always
visit huggingface.
TODO:
We should add all the unit test file one by one in the future.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
