### What this PR does / why we need it?
fix skip ut test and enable ut test run normally
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
# What this PR does / why we need it?
When processing a mix of large and small requests, the TTFT of responses
is significantly reduc\ed. Please refer to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/10235, which achieves the same
effect by simply limiting the number of prompt fills for long requests.
This solution can be applied to both AscendScheduler (V0) and vLLM
Scheduler (V1). Tests show that TTFT can be significantly improved when
handling such mixed requests. However, This capability is currently
missing when Ascend Scheduler is enabled.
This benchmark used the Qwen3-8B model, with a context length of 128K,
running on a single card.
Regarding dataset selection, the sharegpt_clean dataset is used, with
its content concatenated and cropped. Small requests with token=50 and
medium requests with token=10240 were constructed (there were also large
requests with token=102400, but these were ignored because when using
the Prefill First scheduling strategy, max_num_batched_tokens will not
be set to such a large value). When loading vLLM, set
max_num_batched_tokens=22000. This length can accommodate two
medium-sized requests and some short requests, reflecting an extreme
scenario where the budget is almost entirely occupied by longer
requests.
Next, we mix 990 small requests and 100 medium requests into one type of
load scenario (hereinafter referred to as 10%), and similarly generate
load scenarios with 5% medium requests and 1% load scenarios.
Performance tests were conducted separately for enabling vLLMScheduler,
AscendScheduler, and AscendScheduler (long prompt concurrency set to 1).
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
1dfea5f4a9
---------
Signed-off-by: Csrayz <jover@cmbchina.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
On main, AscendScheduler does not support Multimodels, becuse of lacking
of scheduled_encoder_inputs which is need on multimodels inference
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
vLLM version: main@93e28e6862669e3b5cf47cea9f782a65ec47e155
- vLLM version: v0.10.2rc2
- vLLM main:
15b8fef453
---------
Signed-off-by: fan2956 <zhoufan53@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: zhoufan2956 <zhoufan2956@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR enforces the forcible disabling of the chunked prefill feature
in Non-MLA models, as the performance of operators supporting this
functionality is currently suboptimal. Unless the user has enabled
chunked prefill in the ascend_scheduler_config, we would allow this
feature.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
Related: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/2659
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
d21a36f5f9
Signed-off-by: rjg-lyh <1318825571@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove compatibility maintenance for vllm v0.10.1 and v0.10.1.1
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
branch main of vllm-ascend will not be compatible with vllm v0.10.1 and
v0.10.1.1
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
6fb2788163
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This patch also supports v0.10.1
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- CI passed
- test 0.10.1: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/2583
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
321938e9ac
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add configuration check logic for ascend scheduler: if chunked_prefill
is disabled, max_num_batched_tokens couldn't be less than max_model_len,
following vLLM;
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
users cannot set max_num_batched_tokens smaller than max_model_len with
ascend scheduler
### How was this patch tested?
CI and vllm serving passed
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
f77a0802b7
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. use action/checkout@v5 instead of v4
2. remove dbo test case because there is issue with it and will be
refactored later
3. make vllm-ascend compatible with vllm v0.10.1.1 and add CI for it
4. fix sampler api changes introduced by
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/22387
6. fix qwen3 moe config changes intruoduced by
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/20562
7. fix kvcache block changes introduced by
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/23262
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
0c6e40bbaa
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix some ci issue and refactor modelrunner
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
4d9c61993a
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. update `CachedRequestState` as `NewRequestData` changed in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/22570
2. drop maintenance of vllm v0.10.0 in the branch main
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
92ff41abea
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add uts for files in folder /core
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
5a19a6c670
---------
Signed-off-by: lwq <liwenquan5@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: lwq <liwenquan5@huawei.com>
What this PR does / why we need it?
According to issue
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1298 , this pull
request adds unit test code for schedule_config.py.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
8d0a01a5f2
