### What this PR does / why we need it?
Port #1916 and #2157 to master branch to fuse operators in deepseek moe
layers, which can reduce scheduling overhead on devices. Note that this
feature is valid only when `tp_size = 1` and
`multistream_overlap_shared_expert` is enabled with torchair graph mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Users can enable this feature with `--additional-config
'{"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true, "enable_super_kernel":true},
"multistream_overlap_shared_expert":true}'`.
### How was this patch tested?
E2E deepseek serving with 2P1D disaggregated prefill scenarios.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Refacotr and integrate a unified `WeightPrefetchMethod`
- Integrate `gate_up_proj.weight` in quantized Attention modules
- Prefetching these weights ahead of matmul-like operators imporves
performance by reducing L2 cache transfer latency
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Add a new config in `--additional-config` for configuration:
```json
{
"weight_prefetch_config": {
"enabled": True,
"prefetch_ratio": {
"moe": {
"gate_up": 0.8
},
},
},
}
```
This feature is enabled by default, and can be disabled through this
configuration
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: yuzhup <15705211260@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Refacotr and integrate a unified `WeightPrefetchMethod`
- Integrate `qkv_proj.weight` and `o_proj.weight` in quantized Attention
modules
- Prefetching these weights ahead of matmul-like operators imporves
performance by reducing L2 cache transfer latency
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Add a new config in `--additional-config` for configuration:
```json
{
"weight_prefetch_config": {
"enabled": false,
"prefetch_ratio": {
"attn": {
"qkv": 1.0,
"o": 1.0,
},
},
},
}
```
This feature is enabled by default, and can be disabled through this
configuration
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: yuzhup <15705211260@163.com>
Signed-off-by: zhoux77899 <zhouxiang100@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: yuzhup <15705211260@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Revise the EPLB feature guide content.Add eplb params to ascend config.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
52d0cb8458
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
# What this PR does / why we need it?
When processing a mix of large and small requests, the TTFT of responses
is significantly reduc\ed. Please refer to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/10235, which achieves the same
effect by simply limiting the number of prompt fills for long requests.
This solution can be applied to both AscendScheduler (V0) and vLLM
Scheduler (V1). Tests show that TTFT can be significantly improved when
handling such mixed requests. However, This capability is currently
missing when Ascend Scheduler is enabled.
This benchmark used the Qwen3-8B model, with a context length of 128K,
running on a single card.
Regarding dataset selection, the sharegpt_clean dataset is used, with
its content concatenated and cropped. Small requests with token=50 and
medium requests with token=10240 were constructed (there were also large
requests with token=102400, but these were ignored because when using
the Prefill First scheduling strategy, max_num_batched_tokens will not
be set to such a large value). When loading vLLM, set
max_num_batched_tokens=22000. This length can accommodate two
medium-sized requests and some short requests, reflecting an extreme
scenario where the budget is almost entirely occupied by longer
requests.
Next, we mix 990 small requests and 100 medium requests into one type of
load scenario (hereinafter referred to as 10%), and similarly generate
load scenarios with 5% medium requests and 1% load scenarios.
Performance tests were conducted separately for enabling vLLMScheduler,
AscendScheduler, and AscendScheduler (long prompt concurrency set to 1).
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
1dfea5f4a9
---------
Signed-off-by: Csrayz <jover@cmbchina.com>
This PR puts the calculation of shared experts into a separate stream,
overlaping with routing experts.
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
fbd6523ac0
---------
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove chunked prefill for mla branch in mla , and change dtype of
prefill_mask to avoid accuracy problem
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
ef7eefe17a
---------
Signed-off-by: SunnyLee219 <3294305115@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add an option of enable frozen parameter
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
68dbde5dbb
Signed-off-by: 1Fire4 <wangdingyi2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces Oproj matrix tensor model parallel to achieve
decreasing of memory consumption. It only support graph mode in pure DP
scenario.
In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with
oproj_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT increasing, saved 5.8
GB NPU memory per RANK. We got best performance when
oproj_tensor_parallel_size=4 without TPOT increasing.
performance data:
<img width="1442" height="442" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83270fc5-868a-4387-b0a9-fac29b4a376d"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`.
| Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints |
| :---------------------------- |
:--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- |
:----------------- |
| oproj_tensor_parallel_size | Split the o_proj matrix along the row
dimension (head num * head dim) into oproj_tensor_parallel_size pieces.
| No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature
will be enabled, head num * head dim must be divisible by this value. |
example
`--additional_config={"oproj_tensor_parallel_size": 8}`
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
eddaafc1c7
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: zzh <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
support torchair mode
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
5438967fbc
Signed-off-by: zhangdepeng <zhangdepeng2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: p00465316 <panchao13@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: zhangdepeng <zhangdepeng2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces LMhead tensor model parallel to achieve decreasing of
memory consumption, and TPOT performance improvement. It support both
eager mode and graph mode.
In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with
lmhead_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT optimization, saved
1.48 GB NPU memory per RANK.
performance data:
<img width="1444" height="438" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3c5ef0d3-a7c7-46fd-9797-4de728eb0cb0"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`.
| Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints |
| :---------------------------- |
:--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- |
:----------------- |
| lmhead_tensor_parallel_size | Split the lm_head matrix along the
column dimension (vocab_size) into lmhead_tensor_parallel_size pieces |
No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature
will be enabled, vocab_size must be divisible by this value. |
example
`--additional_config={"lmhead_tensor_parallel_size": 8}`
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
de533ab2a1
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: zhangzihang <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
enable_shared_pert_dp is currently on by default. This optimization is
currently only valid for deepseek series models. The default opening
affects the accuracy of the qwen series models.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
use parameter --additional_config='{"enable_shared_expert_dp": true}'
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
d983769c41
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.Shared Expert Sharding Strategy Update: Switched from TP-aligned to
pure DP for shared experts, enabling more efficient execution.
2.O_Proj AllReduce → ReduceScatter: Reduced communication overhead by
using ReduceScatter, made possible by pure DP sharding.
3.AllGather Postponed: Delayed to after QKV down projection to reduce
synchronization impact during prefill.
### How was this patch tested?
Adding ut case in `tests/ut/attention/test_mla_v1.py`
#### How to run
use parameter `--additional_config='{"enable_shared_expert_dp": true}'`
##### a.How to run eager mode
eg:
python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=/model_path
--trust-remote-code -tp 8 -dp 2 --enable_expert_parallel --port 8002
--max-model-len 5120 --max-num-batched-tokens 16384 --enforce-eager
--disable-log-requests
--additional_config='{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":true},"enable_shared_expert_dp":
true,"chunked_prefill_for_mla":true}'
##### b.How to run graph mode
eg:
python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=/model_path
--trust-remote-code -tp 8 -dp 2 --enable_expert_parallel --port 8002
--max-model-len 5120 --max-num-batched-tokens 16384
--disable-log-requests
--additional_config='{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":true},"enable_shared_expert_dp":
true,"chunked_prefill_for_mla":true,"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true}}'
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
9edd1db02b
---------
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove ETP/EP maintained in branch main. We drop this as there is no
relevant scenarios to use ETP now, and we may subsequently advocate
implementing expert tensor parallelism in vLLM to support scenarios
where the expert is needed to be sliced
This is a part of #1422 backport.
Fixes https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1396https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1154
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
We'll not maintain etp/ep in vllm-ascend anymore, and use the tp/ep in
vllm instead.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added and existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
fe8a2c544a
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Add user doc index to make the user guide more clear
- vLLM version: v0.9.1
- vLLM main:
49e8c7ea25
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
