[ops] support advanced apply_top_k_top_p without top_k constraint (#6098)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Implement `apply_top_k_top_p` via ascendC to eliminate the constraint of
k [1,1024]. It enables high performance TopKTopP calculation and avoid
D2H synchronization introduced by k validation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
E2E serving with `k=4096` and `p=0.95`
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
---------
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ elif [[ "$SOC_VERSION" =~ ^ascend910b ]]; then
|
||||
ABSOLUTE_CATLASS_PATH=$(cd "${CATLASS_PATH}" && pwd)
|
||||
export CPATH=${ABSOLUTE_CATLASS_PATH}:${CPATH}
|
||||
|
||||
CUSTOM_OPS="grouped_matmul_swiglu_quant_weight_nz_tensor_list;lightning_indexer;sparse_flash_attention;matmul_allreduce_add_rmsnorm;moe_init_routing_custom;moe_gating_top_k;add_rms_norm_bias;"
|
||||
CUSTOM_OPS="grouped_matmul_swiglu_quant_weight_nz_tensor_list;lightning_indexer;sparse_flash_attention;matmul_allreduce_add_rmsnorm;moe_init_routing_custom;moe_gating_top_k;add_rms_norm_bias;apply_top_k_top_p_custom;"
|
||||
SOC_ARG="ascend910b"
|
||||
elif [[ "$SOC_VERSION" =~ ^ascend910_93 ]]; then
|
||||
# ASCEND910C (A3) series
|
||||
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ elif [[ "$SOC_VERSION" =~ ^ascend910_93 ]]; then
|
||||
"moe_init_routing_custom"
|
||||
"moe_gating_top_k"
|
||||
"add_rms_norm_bias"
|
||||
"apply_top_k_top_p_custom"
|
||||
)
|
||||
CUSTOM_OPS=$(IFS=';'; echo "${CUSTOM_OPS_ARRAY[*]}")
|
||||
SOC_ARG="ascend910_93"
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user