[CI] Update vllm version to 20250922(5aeb925) (#3091)

### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pr bump vllm commit hash to
5aeb925452
fix issues:  
1. https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25345 has remove v0
metadata
2. https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25332
3. https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25334
4. https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/23558, note that this vllm
commit update the model register logic, which will check all the model
registered have the `vllm.model_executor.models` path , which breaks our
custom registration of the deepseek_v3 model (it doesn't exist in the
vllm model path). so I move deepseek_v3 model registy to deepseek_v2 to
solve temporary

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
9607d5eb44

---------

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>

tests/ut/core/test_schedule_config.py

@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ class TestAscendSchedulerConfig(TestBase):
             max_model_len=8192,
             is_multimodal_model=False,
             send_delta_data=False,
-            scheduler_delay_factor=0,
         )
 
     def test_initialize_from_config_with_default(self):
@@ -90,21 +89,6 @@ class TestAscendSchedulerConfig(TestBase):
             str(context.exception),
         )
 
-    def test_not_implemented_delay_factor(self):
-        with self.assertRaises(NotImplementedError) as context:
-            AscendSchedulerConfig.initialize_from_config(
-                self.basic_scheduler_config,
-                AscendSchedulerConfig(
-                    delay_factor=1,
-                    max_num_batched_tokens=2048,
-                    max_model_len=2048,
-                ),
-            )
-        self.assertIn(
-            "currently AscendScheduler doesn't support scheduler_delay_factor",
-            str(context.exception),
-        )
-
     def test_no_override(self):
         ascend_config = AscendSchedulerConfig.initialize_from_config(
             self.basic_scheduler_config, {})

tests/ut/models/test_deepseek_mtp.py

@@ -168,8 +168,6 @@ class TestCustomDeepSeekMTP(PytestBase):
         mocker.patch(
             "vllm_ascend.models.deepseek_mtp.CustomDeepSeekMultiTokenPredictorLayer.__call__",
             return_value=None)
-        mocker.patch("vllm.model_executor.layers.sampler.get_sampler",
-                     return_value=None)
         mocker.patch(
             "vllm_ascend.ops.vocab_parallel_embedding.AscendVocabParallelEmbedding.__init__",
             return_value=None)

tests/ut/torchair/models/test_torchair_deepseek_mtp.py

@@ -165,8 +165,6 @@ class TestTorchairDeepSeekMTP(PytestBase):
         mocker.patch(
             "vllm_ascend.torchair.models.torchair_deepseek_mtp.TorchairDeepSeekMultiTokenPredictorLayer.__call__",
             return_value=None)
-        mocker.patch("vllm.model_executor.layers.sampler.get_sampler",
-                     return_value=None)
         mocker.patch(
             "vllm_ascend.ops.vocab_parallel_embedding.AscendVocabParallelEmbedding.__init__",
             return_value=None)