Files
xc-llm-ascend/vllm_ascend/quantization/quant_config.py

596 lines
24 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#
# Copyright (c) 2025 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
# Copyright 2023 The vLLM team.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
# This file is a part of the vllm-ascend project.
#
from types import MappingProxyType
from typing import Any, Callable, Dict, List, Mapping, Optional
import torch
from vllm.config import get_current_vllm_config
from vllm.distributed import get_tensor_model_parallel_rank
from vllm.model_executor.layers.fused_moe import (FusedMoE, FusedMoEMethodBase,
FusedMoeWeightScaleSupported)
from vllm.model_executor.layers.linear import (LinearBase, LinearMethodBase,
RowParallelLinear)
from vllm.model_executor.layers.quantization import \
register_quantization_config
from vllm.model_executor.layers.quantization.base_config import (
QuantizationConfig, QuantizeMethodBase)
from vllm.model_executor.layers.quantization.kv_cache import BaseKVCacheMethod
from vllm.model_executor.layers.vocab_parallel_embedding import (
UnquantizedEmbeddingMethod, VocabParallelEmbedding)
from vllm.model_executor.models.utils import WeightsMapper
from vllm.model_executor.parameter import PerTensorScaleParameter
from vllm.model_executor.utils import set_weight_attrs
from vllm_ascend.ascend_config import get_ascend_config
from vllm_ascend.distributed.parallel_state import (get_flashcomm2_otp_group,
get_mlp_tp_group,
[feat]: oproj tensor parallelism in pure DP and graph-mode scenarios. (#2167) ### What this PR does / why we need it? This PR introduces Oproj matrix tensor model parallel to achieve decreasing of memory consumption. It only support graph mode in pure DP scenario. In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with oproj_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT increasing, saved 5.8 GB NPU memory per RANK. We got best performance when oproj_tensor_parallel_size=4 without TPOT increasing. performance data: <img width="1442" height="442" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83270fc5-868a-4387-b0a9-fac29b4a376d" /> ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`. | Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints | | :---------------------------- | :--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- | :----------------- | | oproj_tensor_parallel_size | Split the o_proj matrix along the row dimension (head num * head dim) into oproj_tensor_parallel_size pieces. | No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature will be enabled, head num * head dim must be divisible by this value. | example `--additional_config={"oproj_tensor_parallel_size": 8}` ### How was this patch tested? - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/eddaafc1c77b0690194cbd1b73747d572793838c --------- Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: zzh <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
2025-09-07 10:31:32 +08:00
get_otp_group)
from vllm_ascend.ops.fused_moe.fused_moe import AscendUnquantizedFusedMoEMethod
from vllm_ascend.ops.linear import AscendUnquantizedLinearMethod
from vllm_ascend.utils import (ASCEND_QUANTIZATION_METHOD, flashcomm2_enable,
mlp_tp_enable, oproj_tp_enable)
from .utils import get_quant_method, is_mx_quant_type
@register_quantization_config(ASCEND_QUANTIZATION_METHOD)
class AscendQuantConfig(QuantizationConfig):
"""Config class for Ascend
[main][quantization] Adapt to the new format of ds w4a8 weight (#2392) ### What this PR does / why we need it? The deepseek w4a8 weights we supported before were in mindie-format format. It uses int8 to represent int4, so the weight size is similar to w8a8, and we need to do a few extra steps to make vllm-ascend load it normally. Now we can directly use the new weight format, which uses two int4 packs to save the weight, the weight size is reduced, and there is no need to do many extra operations to directly use it on vllm-ascend, but we are also compatible with the weights of the previous mindie format. The weight changes in the new version: 1. The weight is packed (2 int4 pack to int8) 2. The bias required in the apply method is directly generated by modelslim ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? no ### How was this patch tested? Adding ut case in `tests/ut/quantization/test_w4a8_dynamic.py` #### 1.How to get weights using Modelslim ##### Installation steps we can use the branch br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624 git clone -b br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624 https://gitee.com/ascend/msit.git cd msit/msmodelslim bash install.sh ##### Generate w4a8 weights cd /example/DeepSeek Command reference: msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md Execute the [pre-check](https://gitee.com/ascend/msit/blob/br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624/msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md#%E8%BF%90%E8%A1%8C%E5%89%8D%E5%BF%85%E6%A3%80) and [DeepSeek-R1 w4a8 mix quantization](https://gitee.com/ascend/msit/blob/br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624/msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md#deepseek-r1-w4a8-%E6%B7%B7%E5%90%88%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96%E5%89%8D%E4%B8%89%E5%B1%82-mlpw8a8-dynamic-%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96mla%E5%85%B1%E4%BA%AB%E4%B8%93%E5%AE%B6w8a8%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96%E8%B7%AF%E7%94%B1%E4%B8%93%E5%AE%B6w4a8-dynamic%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96) chapter Reference command:python3 quant_deepseek_w4a8.py --model_path {Original weight path} --save_path {Generate weight path} ##### Adapt to vllm-ascend Modification in `config.json`:`"model_type":deepseekv2` is changed to `"model_type":deepseek_v3`; #### 2.How to run w4a8 ##### a.How to run eager mode export VLLM_ASCEND_MLA_PA=1 python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=$1 --trust-remote-code -tp $2 -dp $3 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port $4 --max-model-len $5 --max-num-seqs $6 --enforce-eager eg: python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=/weightpath/w4a8_4_layer --trust-remote-code -tp 4 -dp 4 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port 8002 --max-model-len 5120 --max-num-seqs 128 --enforce-eager ##### b.How to run graph mode export HCCL_BUFFSIZE=1024 python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=$1 --trust-remote-code -tp $2 -dp $3 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port $4 --max-model-len $5 --additional_config='{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":true},"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true}}' eg: python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=/weight/dsr1_w4a8_vllm --trust-remote-code -tp 4 -dp 4 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port 8002 --max-model-len 5120 --additional_config='{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":true},"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true}}' - vLLM version: v0.10.0 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/103f1ec8d348a5f336f11d972d6285c4fb4736d4 --------- Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
2025-08-20 20:25:18 +08:00
This class is a general class that parse quantization configs
that are supported on ascend hardware.
"""
def __init__(self, quant_config: Dict[str, Any]):
super().__init__()
self.quant_description = quant_config
# TODO(whx): remove this adaptation after adding "shared_head"
# to prefix of DeepSeekShareHead in vLLM.
extra_quant_dict = {}
for k in self.quant_description.keys():
if "shared_head" in k:
new_k = k.replace(".shared_head.", ".")
extra_quant_dict[new_k] = self.quant_description[k]
if "weight_packed" in k:
new_k = k.replace("weight_packed", "weight")
extra_quant_dict[new_k] = self.quant_description[k]
self.quant_description.update(extra_quant_dict)
def __repr__(self) -> str:
return "AscendQuantConfig:\n" + super().__repr__()
@classmethod
def get_name(cls) -> str:
return ASCEND_QUANTIZATION_METHOD
@classmethod
def get_supported_act_dtypes(cls) -> List[torch.dtype]:
return [torch.int8, torch.float16, torch.bfloat16]
@classmethod
def get_min_capability(cls) -> int:
raise NotImplementedError(
"Ascend hardware dose not support \"get_min_capability\" feature.")
@classmethod
def get_config_filenames(cls) -> List[str]:
return ["quant_model_description.json"]
@classmethod
def from_config(cls, config: Dict[str, Any]) -> "AscendQuantConfig":
return cls(config)
@classmethod
def override_quantization_method(cls, hf_quant_cfg,
user_quant) -> Optional[str]:
if hf_quant_cfg is not None:
quant_method = hf_quant_cfg.get("quant_method", None)
if not quant_method and torch.npu.is_available():
return ASCEND_QUANTIZATION_METHOD
return None
def quant_prefix_mapper(self, model_type: str, prefix: str) -> str:
# TODO (Levi-JQ): will be removed when QuantizationConfig.apply_vllm_mapper is implemented
prefix_mapping = QUANT_MODEL_PREFIX_MAPPINGS.get(model_type)
if prefix_mapping:
hf_to_vllm_mapper = WeightsMapper(
orig_to_new_prefix=prefix_mapping)
return hf_to_vllm_mapper._map_name(prefix)
return prefix
def get_quant_method(self, layer: torch.nn.Module,
prefix: str) -> Optional["QuantizeMethodBase"]:
vllm_config = get_current_vllm_config()
model_type = vllm_config.model_config.hf_text_config.model_type
if model_type in ["minimax", "minimax_m2"]:
prefix = prefix.replace("mlp", "block_sparse_moe")
#To adapt to minimax, modify the prefix of the model layer name
parts = prefix.split('.')
if "experts" in parts and len(parts) > 2:
exp_idx = parts.index("experts")
if exp_idx + 1 < len(parts) and parts[exp_idx + 1].isdigit():
parts = parts[:exp_idx + 1]
prefix = ".".join(parts)
if model_type in packed_modules_model_mapping:
self.packed_modules_mapping = packed_modules_model_mapping[
model_type]
prefix = self.quant_prefix_mapper(model_type, prefix)
from vllm.attention.layer import Attention
if prefix.startswith("language_model"):
prefix = prefix.split('.', 1)[-1]
if isinstance(layer, LinearBase):
if self.is_layer_skipped_ascend(prefix,
self.packed_modules_mapping):
return AscendUnquantizedLinearMethod()
return AscendLinearMethod(self, prefix,
self.packed_modules_mapping, layer)
elif isinstance(layer, Attention) and \
'fa_quant_type' in self.quant_description.keys() and \
self.quant_description['fa_quant_type'] is not None:
return AscendKVCacheMethod(self, prefix)
elif isinstance(layer, FusedMoE):
if self.is_layer_skipped_ascend(prefix,
self.packed_modules_mapping):
return AscendUnquantizedFusedMoEMethod(layer.moe_config)
return AscendFusedMoEMethod(self, prefix,
self.packed_modules_mapping, layer)
elif isinstance(layer, VocabParallelEmbedding):
if self.is_layer_skipped_ascend(prefix,
self.packed_modules_mapping):
return UnquantizedEmbeddingMethod()
return AscendEmbeddingMethod(self, prefix,
self.packed_modules_mapping, layer)
return None
def is_layer_skipped_ascend(
self,
prefix: str,
fused_mapping: Mapping[str, List[str]] = MappingProxyType({})):
# adapted from vllm.model_executor.layers.quantization.utils.quant_utils.is_layer_skipped
proj_name = prefix.split(".")[-1]
if proj_name in fused_mapping:
shard_prefixes = [
prefix.replace(proj_name, shard_proj_name)
for shard_proj_name in fused_mapping[proj_name]
]
is_skipped = None
for shard_prefix in shard_prefixes:
is_shard_skipped = self.quant_description[shard_prefix +
'.weight'] == "FLOAT"
if is_skipped is None:
is_skipped = is_shard_skipped
elif is_shard_skipped != is_skipped:
raise ValueError(
f"Detected some but not all shards of {prefix} "
"are quantized. All shards of fused layers "
"to have the same precision.")
else:
[Feature] GLM4.6 support mtp with fullgraph (#5460) ### What this PR does / why we need it? GLM4.6 support mtp with fullgraph to improve performance ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? ### How was this patch tested? ` export HCCL_BUFFSIZE=1024 export OMP_PROC_BIND=false export OMP_NUM_THREADS=10 export PYTORCH_NPU_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True export HCCL_OP_EXPANSION_MODE=AIV vllm serve /weight/glm4.6_w8a8_with_float_mtp \ --data-parallel-size 1 \ --tensor-parallel-size 16 \ --seed 1024 \ --served-model-name glm \ --max-model-len 35000 \ --max-num-batched-tokens 16384 \ --max-num-seqs 16 \ --trust-remote-code \ --gpu-memory-utilization 0.9 \ --speculative-config '{"num_speculative_tokens": 1, "model":"/weight/glm4.6_w8a8_with_float_mtp", "method":"mtp"}' \ --compilation-config '{"cudagraph_capture_sizes": [1,2,4,8,16,32], "cudagraph_mode": "FULL_DECODE_ONLY"}' \ --async-scheduling \ ` test case: ` vllm bench serve \ --backend vllm \ --dataset-name prefix_repetition \ --prefix-repetition-prefix-len 22400 \ --prefix-repetition-suffix-len 9600 \ --prefix-repetition-output-len 1024 \ --num-prompts 1 \ --prefix-repetition-num-prefixes 1 \ --ignore-eos \ --model glm \ --tokenizer /weight/glm4.6_w8a8_with_float_mtp \ --seed 1000 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ --endpoint /v1/completions \ --max-concurrency 1 \ --request-rate 1 ` - vLLM version: v0.13.0 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/5326c89803566a131c928f7fdd2100b75c981a42 Signed-off-by: 1092626063 <1092626063@qq.com>
2026-01-09 16:07:42 +08:00
# NOTE: In GLM4.6, the MTP draft model shares the same LM head weigthts
# with the main model. Therefore, before `load_weights()` runs, some parameter
# names may not include the expected prefix and may appear only with the
# ".head" suffix. This can trigger a load-time error, so here we replace the
# key with "lm_head.weight".
key = prefix + '.weight'
if key not in self.quant_description and ".head" in prefix:
key = 'lm_head.weight'
is_skipped = self.quant_description[key] == "FLOAT"
assert is_skipped is not None
return is_skipped
def get_scaled_act_names(self) -> List[str]:
return []
# key: model_type
# value: orig_to_new_prefix
QUANT_MODEL_PREFIX_MAPPINGS = {
"qwen3_vl_moe": {
"visual.": "model.visual.",
"language_model.lm_head.": "lm_head.",
"language_model.model.": "model.language_model.",
},
}
packed_modules_model_mapping = {
"qwen3_moe": {
"qkv_proj": [
"q_proj",
"k_proj",
"v_proj",
],
"gate_up_proj": [
"gate_proj",
"up_proj",
],
"experts":
["experts.0.gate_proj", "experts.0.up_proj", "experts.0.down_proj"],
},
"deepseek_v2": {
"gate_up_proj": ["gate_proj", "up_proj"],
"experts":
["experts.0.gate_proj", "experts.0.up_proj", "experts.0.down_proj"],
"fused_qkv_a_proj": ["q_a_proj", "kv_a_proj_with_mqa"]
},
"deepseek_v3": {
"gate_up_proj": ["gate_proj", "up_proj"],
"experts":
["experts.0.gate_proj", "experts.0.up_proj", "experts.0.down_proj"],
"fused_qkv_a_proj": ["q_a_proj", "kv_a_proj_with_mqa"]
},
[model] Support PanguUltraMoE (#4615) ### What this PR does / why we need it? To support PanguUltraMoE model ### Test result #### Start serving using W8A8 quantized model and ACL graph: Master node: ``` vllm serve $LOCAL_CKPT_DIR \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ --data-parallel-size 2 \ --data-parallel-size-local 1 \ --data-parallel-address $MASTER_NODE_IP \ --data-parallel-rpc-port 13389 \ --tensor-parallel-size 16 \ --seed 1024 \ --enable-expert-parallel \ --served-model-name $NAME \ --max-model-len 4096 \ --max-num-batched-tokens 256 \ --max-num-seqs 18 \ --trust-remote-code \ --gpu-memory-utilization 0.90 \ --quantization ascend \ --additional-config '{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":false, "enable_chunked_prefill":true, "chunked_prefill_enabled":true},"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":false}}' \ --speculative_config '{"method": "pangu_ultra_moe_mtp", "num_speculative_tokens": 1}' \ ``` Other nodes: ``` vllm serve $LOCAL_CKPT_DIR \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ --headless \ --data-parallel-size 2 \ --data-parallel-size-local 1 \ --data-parallel-start-rank 1 \ --data-parallel-address $MASTER_NODE_IP \ --data-parallel-rpc-port 13389 \ --tensor-parallel-size 16 \ --seed 1024 \ --enable-expert-parallel \ --served-model-name $NAME \ --max-model-len 4096 \ --max-num-batched-tokens 256 \ --max-num-seqs 18 \ --trust-remote-code \ --gpu-memory-utilization 0.90 \ --quantization ascend \ --additional-config '{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":false, "enable_chunked_prefill":true, "chunked_prefill_enabled":true},"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":false}}' \ --speculative_config '{"method": "pangu_ultra_moe_mtp", "num_speculative_tokens": 1}' \ ``` Request & Response: - Request ``` curl http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": ""}, {"role": "user", "content": "你是谁?"} ], "max_tokens": "64", "top_p": "0.95", "top_k": "50", "temperature": "0.6", "add_special_tokens" : true }' ``` - Response ``` [unused16] 好的,用户问我是谁,我需要按照之前的设定来回答。首先,我的角色是盘古,由华为开发,属于推理模型。要强调我的主要功能是解答问题和提供信息支持,特别是通过逻辑推理和数据分析处理复杂任务。需要保持回答简洁,用中文,并且符合用户的 ``` - vLLM version: v0.12.0 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.12.0 Signed-off-by: lijifu <lijifu4@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: lijifu <lijifu4@huawei.com>
2025-12-17 16:15:29 +08:00
"pangu_ultra_moe": {
"gate_up_proj": ["gate_proj", "up_proj"],
"experts":
["experts.0.gate_proj", "experts.0.up_proj", "experts.0.down_proj"],
"fused_qkv_a_proj": ["q_a_proj", "kv_a_proj_with_mqa"]
},
"kimi_k2": {
"gate_up_proj": ["gate_proj", "up_proj"],
"experts":
["experts.0.gate_proj", "experts.0.up_proj", "experts.0.down_proj"],
"fused_qkv_a_proj": ["q_a_proj", "kv_a_proj_with_mqa"]
},
"deepseek_v32": {
"gate_up_proj": ["gate_proj", "up_proj"],
"experts":
[1/N][Refactor] Refactor code to adapt with vllm main (#3612) ### What this PR does / why we need it? This is the step 1 of refactoring code to adapt with vllm main, and this pr aligned with https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/17c540a993af88204ad1b78345c8a865cf58ce44 1. refactor deepseek to the latest code arch as of https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/17c540a993af88204ad1b78345c8a865cf58ce44 2. bunches of fixes due to vllm changes - Fix `AscendScheduler` `__post_init__`, caused by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25075 - Fix `AscendScheduler` init got an unexpected arg `block_size`, caused by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/26296 - Fix `KVCacheManager` `get_num_common_prefix_blocks` arg, caused by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/23485 - Fix `MLAAttention` import,caused by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25103 - Fix `SharedFusedMoE` import, caused by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/26145 - Fix `LazyLoader` improt, caused by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27022 - Fix `vllm.utils.swap_dict_values` improt, caused by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/26990 - Fix `Backend` enum import, caused by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25893 - Fix `CompilationLevel` renaming to `CompilationMode` issue introduced by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/26355 - Fix fused_moe ops, caused by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/24097 - Fix bert model because of `inputs_embeds`, caused by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25922 - Fix MRope because of `get_input_positions_tensor` to `get_mrope_input_positions`, caused by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/24172 - Fix `splitting_ops` changes introduced by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25845 - Fix multi-modality changes introduced by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/16229 - Fix lora bias dropping issue introduced by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25807 - Fix structured ouput break introduced by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/26737 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? ### How was this patch tested? CI passed with existing test. - vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0 --------- Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com> Signed-off-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com> Co-authored-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com>
2025-10-24 16:55:08 +08:00
["experts.0.gate_proj", "experts.0.up_proj", "experts.0.down_proj"],
"fused_qkv_a_proj": ["q_a_proj", "kv_a_proj_with_mqa"]
},
# NOTE 1.The quantized MTP layer of deepseek on the NPU is not quantized;
# NOTE 2.The description file generated by the current msmodelslim tool does not have
# MTP layer info. Please manually add it and set the value to FLOAT.
"deepseek_mtp": {
"gate_up_proj": ["gate_proj", "up_proj"],
"experts":
["experts.0.gate_proj", "experts.0.up_proj", "experts.0.down_proj"]
},
[model] Support PanguUltraMoE (#4615) ### What this PR does / why we need it? To support PanguUltraMoE model ### Test result #### Start serving using W8A8 quantized model and ACL graph: Master node: ``` vllm serve $LOCAL_CKPT_DIR \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ --data-parallel-size 2 \ --data-parallel-size-local 1 \ --data-parallel-address $MASTER_NODE_IP \ --data-parallel-rpc-port 13389 \ --tensor-parallel-size 16 \ --seed 1024 \ --enable-expert-parallel \ --served-model-name $NAME \ --max-model-len 4096 \ --max-num-batched-tokens 256 \ --max-num-seqs 18 \ --trust-remote-code \ --gpu-memory-utilization 0.90 \ --quantization ascend \ --additional-config '{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":false, "enable_chunked_prefill":true, "chunked_prefill_enabled":true},"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":false}}' \ --speculative_config '{"method": "pangu_ultra_moe_mtp", "num_speculative_tokens": 1}' \ ``` Other nodes: ``` vllm serve $LOCAL_CKPT_DIR \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ --headless \ --data-parallel-size 2 \ --data-parallel-size-local 1 \ --data-parallel-start-rank 1 \ --data-parallel-address $MASTER_NODE_IP \ --data-parallel-rpc-port 13389 \ --tensor-parallel-size 16 \ --seed 1024 \ --enable-expert-parallel \ --served-model-name $NAME \ --max-model-len 4096 \ --max-num-batched-tokens 256 \ --max-num-seqs 18 \ --trust-remote-code \ --gpu-memory-utilization 0.90 \ --quantization ascend \ --additional-config '{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":false, "enable_chunked_prefill":true, "chunked_prefill_enabled":true},"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":false}}' \ --speculative_config '{"method": "pangu_ultra_moe_mtp", "num_speculative_tokens": 1}' \ ``` Request & Response: - Request ``` curl http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": ""}, {"role": "user", "content": "你是谁?"} ], "max_tokens": "64", "top_p": "0.95", "top_k": "50", "temperature": "0.6", "add_special_tokens" : true }' ``` - Response ``` [unused16] 好的,用户问我是谁,我需要按照之前的设定来回答。首先,我的角色是盘古,由华为开发,属于推理模型。要强调我的主要功能是解答问题和提供信息支持,特别是通过逻辑推理和数据分析处理复杂任务。需要保持回答简洁,用中文,并且符合用户的 ``` - vLLM version: v0.12.0 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.12.0 Signed-off-by: lijifu <lijifu4@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: lijifu <lijifu4@huawei.com>
2025-12-17 16:15:29 +08:00
"pangu_ultra_moe_mtp": {
"gate_up_proj": ["gate_proj", "up_proj"],
"experts":
["experts.0.gate_proj", "experts.0.up_proj", "experts.0.down_proj"],
"fused_qkv_a_proj": ["q_a_proj", "kv_a_proj_with_mqa"]
},
"qwen3_next": {
"qkv_proj": [
"q_proj",
"k_proj",
"v_proj",
],
"gate_up_proj": ["gate_proj", "up_proj"],
"in_proj": ["in_proj_qkvz", "in_proj_ba"],
"experts":
["experts.0.gate_proj", "experts.0.up_proj", "experts.0.down_proj"]
},
"qwen2_5_vl": {
"qkv_proj": [
"q_proj",
"k_proj",
"v_proj",
],
"gate_up_proj": [
"gate_proj",
"up_proj",
],
},
"qwen3_vl_moe": {
"qkv_proj": [
"q_proj",
"k_proj",
"v_proj",
],
"gate_up_proj": [
"gate_proj",
"up_proj",
],
"experts":
["experts.0.gate_proj", "experts.0.up_proj", "experts.0.down_proj"],
},
"glm4_moe": {
"qkv_proj": [
"q_proj",
"k_proj",
"v_proj",
],
"gate_up_proj": [
"gate_proj",
"up_proj",
],
"experts":
["experts.0.gate_proj", "experts.0.up_proj", "experts.0.down_proj"]
},
"longcat_flash": {
"gate_up_proj": ["gate_proj", "up_proj"],
"experts":
["experts.0.gate_proj", "experts.0.up_proj", "experts.0.down_proj"],
"fused_qkv_a_proj": ["q_a_proj", "kv_a_proj_with_mqa"]
},
"minimax_m2": {
"qkv_proj": [
"q_proj",
"k_proj",
"v_proj",
],
"experts": ["experts.0.w1", "experts.0.w2", "experts.0.w3"]
}
}
class AscendLinearMethod(LinearMethodBase):
"""Linear method for Ascend quantization.
Args:
quant_config: The Ascend quantization config.
"""
def __init__(self,
quant_config: AscendQuantConfig,
prefix: str,
packed_modules_mapping: Dict[str, Any] | None,
layer: torch.nn.Module = None) -> None:
self.quant_method = get_quant_method(quant_config.quant_description,
prefix,
"linear",
packed_modules_mapping,
layer=layer)
def create_weights(
self,
layer: torch.nn.Module,
input_size_per_partition: int,
output_partition_sizes: List[int],
input_size: int,
output_size: int,
params_dtype: torch.dtype,
**extra_weight_attrs,
) -> None:
output_size_per_partition = sum(output_partition_sizes)
weight_loader = extra_weight_attrs.get("weight_loader")
weight_dict = self.quant_method.get_weight(input_size_per_partition,
output_size_per_partition,
params_dtype)
[Feat][quantization] Support new version w4a8 dynamic quantization for Linear layers (#3311) ### What this PR does / why we need it? **Problem Description:** The existing implementation for the w4a8-dynamic linear method only supports the old quantization format from msmodelslim. When attempting to load models quantized with the new version, vLLM encounters errors due to mismatched tensor shapes and unprocessed quantization parameters. Relavant issues: - https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/3192 - https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/3152 **Proposed Changes:** 1. Add support for w4a8 dynamic(new format) in AscendW4A8DynamicLinearMethod and TorchairAscendW4A8DynamicLinearMethod 2. Add unit tests and e2e tests for w4a8 dynamic new and old format models <details> <summary><b>details</b></summary> 1. **Support for new w4a8-dynamic format:** * Detects quantization format by reading the "version" field in quant_description to ensure backward compatibility. * Handles the new pre-packed weight format (`2x int4` in an `int8`), which has a halved dimension. It tells the vLLM loader how to unpack it using `_packed_dim` and `_packed_factor`. * Supports the new `scale_bias` parameter, setting its shape based on the layer type, as required by msmodelslim. For api consistency and future use, the `layer_type` parameter was also added to other quantization methods. * Updates the weight processing logic: new format weights are handled with `.view(torch.int32)` since they're pre-packed, while old ones are processed with `npu_convert_weight_to_int4pack`. 2. **New unit and E2E tests:** * Added unit tests that verify the logic for both the old and new formats. * Split the distributed E2E test to confirm that both old and new format models work correctly. </details> Theoretically, these changes will provide support for all common new version w4a8(dynamic) models from msmodelslim. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? no ### How was this patch tested? I implement relevant unit tests and e2e tests and test the changes with following commands: ```bash # unit tests python -m pytest tests/ut/quantization/test_w4a8_dynamic.py tests/ut/torchair/quantization/test_torchair_w4a8_dynamic.py -v # e2e tests pytest tests/e2e/singlecard/test_quantization.py -v -s pytest tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_Qwen3_W4A8DYNAMIC_new_version -v -s pytest tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_Qwen3_W4A8DYNAMIC_old_version -v -s pytest tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_DeepSeek_W4A8DYNAMIC -v -s ``` I also tested Hunyuan-1.8B-Instruct quantized with the new w4a8-dynamic format: ``` vllm serve ./models/Hunyuan-1.8B-Instruct-quantized --gpu-memory-utilization 0.96 --quantization ascend --max-model-len 9600 --seed 0 --max-num-batched-tokens 16384 ``` All tests mentioned passed locally. **NOTE: I use quantization model from my own repo in test_offline_inference_distributed.py**. Here is the description: [Anionex/Qwen3-1.7B-W4A8-V1](https://modelscope.cn/models/Anionex/Qwen3-1.7B-W4A8-V1/summary) (including quantization steps).This should be replaced by a model in vllm-ascend ci modelscope repo. Thanks for reading! - vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0 --------- Signed-off-by: Anionex <1005128408@qq.com>
2025-10-21 20:18:39 +08:00
# Extract packing information (if present)
packed_dim = weight_dict.pop("_packed_dim", None)
packed_factor = weight_dict.pop("_packed_factor", None)
for weight_name, weight_param in weight_dict.items():
param = torch.nn.Parameter(weight_param, requires_grad=False)
set_weight_attrs(param, {"input_dim": 1, "output_dim": 0})
[Feat][quantization] Support new version w4a8 dynamic quantization for Linear layers (#3311) ### What this PR does / why we need it? **Problem Description:** The existing implementation for the w4a8-dynamic linear method only supports the old quantization format from msmodelslim. When attempting to load models quantized with the new version, vLLM encounters errors due to mismatched tensor shapes and unprocessed quantization parameters. Relavant issues: - https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/3192 - https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/3152 **Proposed Changes:** 1. Add support for w4a8 dynamic(new format) in AscendW4A8DynamicLinearMethod and TorchairAscendW4A8DynamicLinearMethod 2. Add unit tests and e2e tests for w4a8 dynamic new and old format models <details> <summary><b>details</b></summary> 1. **Support for new w4a8-dynamic format:** * Detects quantization format by reading the "version" field in quant_description to ensure backward compatibility. * Handles the new pre-packed weight format (`2x int4` in an `int8`), which has a halved dimension. It tells the vLLM loader how to unpack it using `_packed_dim` and `_packed_factor`. * Supports the new `scale_bias` parameter, setting its shape based on the layer type, as required by msmodelslim. For api consistency and future use, the `layer_type` parameter was also added to other quantization methods. * Updates the weight processing logic: new format weights are handled with `.view(torch.int32)` since they're pre-packed, while old ones are processed with `npu_convert_weight_to_int4pack`. 2. **New unit and E2E tests:** * Added unit tests that verify the logic for both the old and new formats. * Split the distributed E2E test to confirm that both old and new format models work correctly. </details> Theoretically, these changes will provide support for all common new version w4a8(dynamic) models from msmodelslim. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? no ### How was this patch tested? I implement relevant unit tests and e2e tests and test the changes with following commands: ```bash # unit tests python -m pytest tests/ut/quantization/test_w4a8_dynamic.py tests/ut/torchair/quantization/test_torchair_w4a8_dynamic.py -v # e2e tests pytest tests/e2e/singlecard/test_quantization.py -v -s pytest tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_Qwen3_W4A8DYNAMIC_new_version -v -s pytest tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_Qwen3_W4A8DYNAMIC_old_version -v -s pytest tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_DeepSeek_W4A8DYNAMIC -v -s ``` I also tested Hunyuan-1.8B-Instruct quantized with the new w4a8-dynamic format: ``` vllm serve ./models/Hunyuan-1.8B-Instruct-quantized --gpu-memory-utilization 0.96 --quantization ascend --max-model-len 9600 --seed 0 --max-num-batched-tokens 16384 ``` All tests mentioned passed locally. **NOTE: I use quantization model from my own repo in test_offline_inference_distributed.py**. Here is the description: [Anionex/Qwen3-1.7B-W4A8-V1](https://modelscope.cn/models/Anionex/Qwen3-1.7B-W4A8-V1/summary) (including quantization steps).This should be replaced by a model in vllm-ascend ci modelscope repo. Thanks for reading! - vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0 --------- Signed-off-by: Anionex <1005128408@qq.com>
2025-10-21 20:18:39 +08:00
# Set packing attributes if the weight is packed
if packed_dim is not None and packed_factor is not None:
set_weight_attrs(param, {
"packed_dim": packed_dim,
"packed_factor": packed_factor
})
layer.register_parameter(weight_name, param)
set_weight_attrs(param, extra_weight_attrs)
pertensor_dict = self.quant_method.get_pertensor_param(params_dtype)
for pertensor_name, pertensor_param in pertensor_dict.items():
param = PerTensorScaleParameter(data=pertensor_param,
weight_loader=weight_loader)
# disable warning
param.ignore_warning = True
layer.register_parameter(pertensor_name, param)
param.weight_loader = extra_weight_attrs.get("weight_loader")
perchannel_dict = self.quant_method.get_perchannel_param(
output_size_per_partition, params_dtype)
for perchannel_name, perchannel_param in perchannel_dict.items():
param = torch.nn.Parameter(perchannel_param, requires_grad=False)
set_weight_attrs(param, {"output_dim": 0})
layer.register_parameter(perchannel_name, param)
set_weight_attrs(param, extra_weight_attrs)
[Feat][quantization] Support new version w4a8 dynamic quantization for Linear layers (#3311) ### What this PR does / why we need it? **Problem Description:** The existing implementation for the w4a8-dynamic linear method only supports the old quantization format from msmodelslim. When attempting to load models quantized with the new version, vLLM encounters errors due to mismatched tensor shapes and unprocessed quantization parameters. Relavant issues: - https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/3192 - https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/3152 **Proposed Changes:** 1. Add support for w4a8 dynamic(new format) in AscendW4A8DynamicLinearMethod and TorchairAscendW4A8DynamicLinearMethod 2. Add unit tests and e2e tests for w4a8 dynamic new and old format models <details> <summary><b>details</b></summary> 1. **Support for new w4a8-dynamic format:** * Detects quantization format by reading the "version" field in quant_description to ensure backward compatibility. * Handles the new pre-packed weight format (`2x int4` in an `int8`), which has a halved dimension. It tells the vLLM loader how to unpack it using `_packed_dim` and `_packed_factor`. * Supports the new `scale_bias` parameter, setting its shape based on the layer type, as required by msmodelslim. For api consistency and future use, the `layer_type` parameter was also added to other quantization methods. * Updates the weight processing logic: new format weights are handled with `.view(torch.int32)` since they're pre-packed, while old ones are processed with `npu_convert_weight_to_int4pack`. 2. **New unit and E2E tests:** * Added unit tests that verify the logic for both the old and new formats. * Split the distributed E2E test to confirm that both old and new format models work correctly. </details> Theoretically, these changes will provide support for all common new version w4a8(dynamic) models from msmodelslim. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? no ### How was this patch tested? I implement relevant unit tests and e2e tests and test the changes with following commands: ```bash # unit tests python -m pytest tests/ut/quantization/test_w4a8_dynamic.py tests/ut/torchair/quantization/test_torchair_w4a8_dynamic.py -v # e2e tests pytest tests/e2e/singlecard/test_quantization.py -v -s pytest tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_Qwen3_W4A8DYNAMIC_new_version -v -s pytest tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_Qwen3_W4A8DYNAMIC_old_version -v -s pytest tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_DeepSeek_W4A8DYNAMIC -v -s ``` I also tested Hunyuan-1.8B-Instruct quantized with the new w4a8-dynamic format: ``` vllm serve ./models/Hunyuan-1.8B-Instruct-quantized --gpu-memory-utilization 0.96 --quantization ascend --max-model-len 9600 --seed 0 --max-num-batched-tokens 16384 ``` All tests mentioned passed locally. **NOTE: I use quantization model from my own repo in test_offline_inference_distributed.py**. Here is the description: [Anionex/Qwen3-1.7B-W4A8-V1](https://modelscope.cn/models/Anionex/Qwen3-1.7B-W4A8-V1/summary) (including quantization steps).This should be replaced by a model in vllm-ascend ci modelscope repo. Thanks for reading! - vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0 --------- Signed-off-by: Anionex <1005128408@qq.com>
2025-10-21 20:18:39 +08:00
# NOTE: In w4a8 quantization implementation,
# for down_proj and o_proj scale_bias shape is [output_size, 16],
# others are [output_size, 1]
layer_type = "row" if isinstance(layer,
RowParallelLinear) else "others"
pergroup_dict = self.quant_method.get_pergroup_param(
[Feat][quantization] Support new version w4a8 dynamic quantization for Linear layers (#3311) ### What this PR does / why we need it? **Problem Description:** The existing implementation for the w4a8-dynamic linear method only supports the old quantization format from msmodelslim. When attempting to load models quantized with the new version, vLLM encounters errors due to mismatched tensor shapes and unprocessed quantization parameters. Relavant issues: - https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/3192 - https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/3152 **Proposed Changes:** 1. Add support for w4a8 dynamic(new format) in AscendW4A8DynamicLinearMethod and TorchairAscendW4A8DynamicLinearMethod 2. Add unit tests and e2e tests for w4a8 dynamic new and old format models <details> <summary><b>details</b></summary> 1. **Support for new w4a8-dynamic format:** * Detects quantization format by reading the "version" field in quant_description to ensure backward compatibility. * Handles the new pre-packed weight format (`2x int4` in an `int8`), which has a halved dimension. It tells the vLLM loader how to unpack it using `_packed_dim` and `_packed_factor`. * Supports the new `scale_bias` parameter, setting its shape based on the layer type, as required by msmodelslim. For api consistency and future use, the `layer_type` parameter was also added to other quantization methods. * Updates the weight processing logic: new format weights are handled with `.view(torch.int32)` since they're pre-packed, while old ones are processed with `npu_convert_weight_to_int4pack`. 2. **New unit and E2E tests:** * Added unit tests that verify the logic for both the old and new formats. * Split the distributed E2E test to confirm that both old and new format models work correctly. </details> Theoretically, these changes will provide support for all common new version w4a8(dynamic) models from msmodelslim. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? no ### How was this patch tested? I implement relevant unit tests and e2e tests and test the changes with following commands: ```bash # unit tests python -m pytest tests/ut/quantization/test_w4a8_dynamic.py tests/ut/torchair/quantization/test_torchair_w4a8_dynamic.py -v # e2e tests pytest tests/e2e/singlecard/test_quantization.py -v -s pytest tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_Qwen3_W4A8DYNAMIC_new_version -v -s pytest tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_Qwen3_W4A8DYNAMIC_old_version -v -s pytest tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_DeepSeek_W4A8DYNAMIC -v -s ``` I also tested Hunyuan-1.8B-Instruct quantized with the new w4a8-dynamic format: ``` vllm serve ./models/Hunyuan-1.8B-Instruct-quantized --gpu-memory-utilization 0.96 --quantization ascend --max-model-len 9600 --seed 0 --max-num-batched-tokens 16384 ``` All tests mentioned passed locally. **NOTE: I use quantization model from my own repo in test_offline_inference_distributed.py**. Here is the description: [Anionex/Qwen3-1.7B-W4A8-V1](https://modelscope.cn/models/Anionex/Qwen3-1.7B-W4A8-V1/summary) (including quantization steps).This should be replaced by a model in vllm-ascend ci modelscope repo. Thanks for reading! - vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0 --------- Signed-off-by: Anionex <1005128408@qq.com>
2025-10-21 20:18:39 +08:00
input_size_per_partition,
output_size_per_partition,
params_dtype,
layer_type=layer_type)
for pergroup_name, pergroup_param in pergroup_dict.items():
param = torch.nn.Parameter(pergroup_param, requires_grad=False)
set_weight_attrs(param, {"output_dim": 0})
layer.register_parameter(pergroup_name, param)
set_weight_attrs(param, extra_weight_attrs)
if "weight_scale_second" in pergroup_name or "weight_offset_second" in pergroup_name \
or is_mx_quant_type(self.quant_method):
setattr(param, "input_dim", 1)
param.input_dim = 1
def process_weights_after_loading(self, layer: torch.nn.Module) -> None:
if hasattr(self.quant_method, "process_weights_after_loading"):
self.quant_method.process_weights_after_loading(layer)
def apply(
self,
layer: torch.nn.Module,
x: torch.Tensor,
bias: Optional[torch.Tensor] = None,
) -> torch.Tensor:
if isinstance(layer, RowParallelLinear):
[feat]: oproj tensor parallelism in pure DP and graph-mode scenarios. (#2167) ### What this PR does / why we need it? This PR introduces Oproj matrix tensor model parallel to achieve decreasing of memory consumption. It only support graph mode in pure DP scenario. In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with oproj_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT increasing, saved 5.8 GB NPU memory per RANK. We got best performance when oproj_tensor_parallel_size=4 without TPOT increasing. performance data: <img width="1442" height="442" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83270fc5-868a-4387-b0a9-fac29b4a376d" /> ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`. | Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints | | :---------------------------- | :--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- | :----------------- | | oproj_tensor_parallel_size | Split the o_proj matrix along the row dimension (head num * head dim) into oproj_tensor_parallel_size pieces. | No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature will be enabled, head num * head dim must be divisible by this value. | example `--additional_config={"oproj_tensor_parallel_size": 8}` ### How was this patch tested? - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/eddaafc1c77b0690194cbd1b73747d572793838c --------- Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: zzh <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
2025-09-07 10:31:32 +08:00
if layer.prefix.find("o_proj") != -1 and oproj_tp_enable():
tp_rank = get_otp_group().rank_in_group
elif layer.prefix.find("down_proj") != -1 and mlp_tp_enable():
tp_rank = get_mlp_tp_group().rank_in_group
elif (layer.prefix.find("o_proj") != -1 or
layer.prefix.find("out_proj") != -1) and flashcomm2_enable():
if get_ascend_config(
).flashcomm2_oproj_tensor_parallel_size == 1:
tp_rank = 0
else:
tp_rank = get_flashcomm2_otp_group().rank_in_group
[feat]: oproj tensor parallelism in pure DP and graph-mode scenarios. (#2167) ### What this PR does / why we need it? This PR introduces Oproj matrix tensor model parallel to achieve decreasing of memory consumption. It only support graph mode in pure DP scenario. In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with oproj_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT increasing, saved 5.8 GB NPU memory per RANK. We got best performance when oproj_tensor_parallel_size=4 without TPOT increasing. performance data: <img width="1442" height="442" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83270fc5-868a-4387-b0a9-fac29b4a376d" /> ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`. | Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints | | :---------------------------- | :--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- | :----------------- | | oproj_tensor_parallel_size | Split the o_proj matrix along the row dimension (head num * head dim) into oproj_tensor_parallel_size pieces. | No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature will be enabled, head num * head dim must be divisible by this value. | example `--additional_config={"oproj_tensor_parallel_size": 8}` ### How was this patch tested? - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/eddaafc1c77b0690194cbd1b73747d572793838c --------- Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: zzh <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
2025-09-07 10:31:32 +08:00
else:
tp_rank = get_tensor_model_parallel_rank()
else:
tp_rank = 0
return self.quant_method.apply(layer, x, bias, tp_rank)
class AscendKVCacheMethod(BaseKVCacheMethod):
"""KVCache method for Ascend quantization.
Args:
quant_config: The Ascend quantization config.
"""
def __init__(self, quant_config: AscendQuantConfig, prefix: str) -> None:
self.quant_method = get_quant_method(quant_config.quant_description,
prefix, "attention")
def create_weights(self, layer: torch.nn.Module) -> None:
# Different from linear method, there are no weight processing/slicing
# steps for attention in vllm. So the whole process of create weights
# is hidden into the specific quant method.
self.quant_method.create_weights(layer)
def process_weights_after_loading(self, layer: torch.nn.Module) -> None:
if hasattr(self.quant_method, "process_weights_after_loading"):
self.quant_method.process_weights_after_loading(layer)
def apply(self, layer: torch.nn.Module, query: torch.Tensor,
key: torch.Tensor, value: torch.Tensor, kv_cache, attn_metadata,
attn_type, scale, output) -> torch.Tensor:
return self.quant_method.apply(layer, query, key, value, kv_cache,
attn_metadata, attn_type, scale, output)
class AscendFusedMoEMethod(FusedMoEMethodBase):
"""FusedMoE method for Ascend quantization.
Args:
quant_config: The Ascend quantization config.
"""
def __init__(self, quant_config: AscendQuantConfig, prefix: str,
packed_modules_mapping: Dict[str,
Any], layer: torch.nn.Module):
super().__init__(layer.moe_config)
self.quant_method = get_quant_method(quant_config.quant_description,
prefix,
"moe",
packed_modules_mapping,
layer=layer)
def create_weights(
self,
layer: torch.nn.Module,
num_experts: int,
hidden_size: int,
intermediate_size_per_partition: int,
params_dtype: torch.dtype,
**extra_weight_attrs,
) -> None:
weight_param = self.quant_method.get_weight(
num_experts, intermediate_size_per_partition, hidden_size,
params_dtype)
for param_key, param_value in weight_param.items():
param = torch.nn.Parameter(param_value, requires_grad=False)
layer.register_parameter(param_key, param)
set_weight_attrs(param, extra_weight_attrs)
extra_weight_attrs.update(
{"quant_method": FusedMoeWeightScaleSupported.CHANNEL.value})
[main][quantization] Adapt to the new format of ds w4a8 weight (#2392) ### What this PR does / why we need it? The deepseek w4a8 weights we supported before were in mindie-format format. It uses int8 to represent int4, so the weight size is similar to w8a8, and we need to do a few extra steps to make vllm-ascend load it normally. Now we can directly use the new weight format, which uses two int4 packs to save the weight, the weight size is reduced, and there is no need to do many extra operations to directly use it on vllm-ascend, but we are also compatible with the weights of the previous mindie format. The weight changes in the new version: 1. The weight is packed (2 int4 pack to int8) 2. The bias required in the apply method is directly generated by modelslim ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? no ### How was this patch tested? Adding ut case in `tests/ut/quantization/test_w4a8_dynamic.py` #### 1.How to get weights using Modelslim ##### Installation steps we can use the branch br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624 git clone -b br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624 https://gitee.com/ascend/msit.git cd msit/msmodelslim bash install.sh ##### Generate w4a8 weights cd /example/DeepSeek Command reference: msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md Execute the [pre-check](https://gitee.com/ascend/msit/blob/br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624/msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md#%E8%BF%90%E8%A1%8C%E5%89%8D%E5%BF%85%E6%A3%80) and [DeepSeek-R1 w4a8 mix quantization](https://gitee.com/ascend/msit/blob/br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624/msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md#deepseek-r1-w4a8-%E6%B7%B7%E5%90%88%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96%E5%89%8D%E4%B8%89%E5%B1%82-mlpw8a8-dynamic-%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96mla%E5%85%B1%E4%BA%AB%E4%B8%93%E5%AE%B6w8a8%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96%E8%B7%AF%E7%94%B1%E4%B8%93%E5%AE%B6w4a8-dynamic%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96) chapter Reference command:python3 quant_deepseek_w4a8.py --model_path {Original weight path} --save_path {Generate weight path} ##### Adapt to vllm-ascend Modification in `config.json`:`"model_type":deepseekv2` is changed to `"model_type":deepseek_v3`; #### 2.How to run w4a8 ##### a.How to run eager mode export VLLM_ASCEND_MLA_PA=1 python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=$1 --trust-remote-code -tp $2 -dp $3 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port $4 --max-model-len $5 --max-num-seqs $6 --enforce-eager eg: python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=/weightpath/w4a8_4_layer --trust-remote-code -tp 4 -dp 4 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port 8002 --max-model-len 5120 --max-num-seqs 128 --enforce-eager ##### b.How to run graph mode export HCCL_BUFFSIZE=1024 python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=$1 --trust-remote-code -tp $2 -dp $3 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port $4 --max-model-len $5 --additional_config='{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":true},"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true}}' eg: python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=/weight/dsr1_w4a8_vllm --trust-remote-code -tp 4 -dp 4 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port 8002 --max-model-len 5120 --additional_config='{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":true},"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true}}' - vLLM version: v0.10.0 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/103f1ec8d348a5f336f11d972d6285c4fb4736d4 --------- Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
2025-08-20 20:25:18 +08:00
per_group_param = [
"weight_scale_second", "weight_offset_second", "scale_bias"
] + ["weight_scale", "weight_offset"] if hasattr(
self.quant_method,
"group_size") and self.quant_method.group_size > 0 else []
dynamic_quant_param = self.quant_method.get_dynamic_quant_param(
num_experts, intermediate_size_per_partition, hidden_size,
params_dtype)
for param_key, param_value in dynamic_quant_param.items():
param = torch.nn.Parameter(param_value, requires_grad=False)
layer.register_parameter(param_key, param)
set_weight_attrs(param, extra_weight_attrs)
[main][quantization] Adapt to the new format of ds w4a8 weight (#2392) ### What this PR does / why we need it? The deepseek w4a8 weights we supported before were in mindie-format format. It uses int8 to represent int4, so the weight size is similar to w8a8, and we need to do a few extra steps to make vllm-ascend load it normally. Now we can directly use the new weight format, which uses two int4 packs to save the weight, the weight size is reduced, and there is no need to do many extra operations to directly use it on vllm-ascend, but we are also compatible with the weights of the previous mindie format. The weight changes in the new version: 1. The weight is packed (2 int4 pack to int8) 2. The bias required in the apply method is directly generated by modelslim ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? no ### How was this patch tested? Adding ut case in `tests/ut/quantization/test_w4a8_dynamic.py` #### 1.How to get weights using Modelslim ##### Installation steps we can use the branch br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624 git clone -b br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624 https://gitee.com/ascend/msit.git cd msit/msmodelslim bash install.sh ##### Generate w4a8 weights cd /example/DeepSeek Command reference: msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md Execute the [pre-check](https://gitee.com/ascend/msit/blob/br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624/msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md#%E8%BF%90%E8%A1%8C%E5%89%8D%E5%BF%85%E6%A3%80) and [DeepSeek-R1 w4a8 mix quantization](https://gitee.com/ascend/msit/blob/br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624/msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md#deepseek-r1-w4a8-%E6%B7%B7%E5%90%88%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96%E5%89%8D%E4%B8%89%E5%B1%82-mlpw8a8-dynamic-%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96mla%E5%85%B1%E4%BA%AB%E4%B8%93%E5%AE%B6w8a8%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96%E8%B7%AF%E7%94%B1%E4%B8%93%E5%AE%B6w4a8-dynamic%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96) chapter Reference command:python3 quant_deepseek_w4a8.py --model_path {Original weight path} --save_path {Generate weight path} ##### Adapt to vllm-ascend Modification in `config.json`:`"model_type":deepseekv2` is changed to `"model_type":deepseek_v3`; #### 2.How to run w4a8 ##### a.How to run eager mode export VLLM_ASCEND_MLA_PA=1 python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=$1 --trust-remote-code -tp $2 -dp $3 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port $4 --max-model-len $5 --max-num-seqs $6 --enforce-eager eg: python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=/weightpath/w4a8_4_layer --trust-remote-code -tp 4 -dp 4 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port 8002 --max-model-len 5120 --max-num-seqs 128 --enforce-eager ##### b.How to run graph mode export HCCL_BUFFSIZE=1024 python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=$1 --trust-remote-code -tp $2 -dp $3 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port $4 --max-model-len $5 --additional_config='{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":true},"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true}}' eg: python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=/weight/dsr1_w4a8_vllm --trust-remote-code -tp 4 -dp 4 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port 8002 --max-model-len 5120 --additional_config='{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":true},"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true}}' - vLLM version: v0.10.0 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/103f1ec8d348a5f336f11d972d6285c4fb4736d4 --------- Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
2025-08-20 20:25:18 +08:00
if any(fields in param_key for fields in per_group_param):
[main][Feature] Support deepseek w4a8 quantization (#2172) ### What this PR does / why we need it? Supports Deepseek-R1 w4a8 quantization. Since R1 w4a8 uses mixed quantization, only the MOE layer uses w4a8_dynamic quantization, so we added the w4a8_dynamic.py file, which includes the AscendW4A8DynamicFusedMoEMethod class. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? no ### How was this patch tested? Adding ut case in `tests/ut/quantization/test_w4a8_dynamic.py` and `tests/ut/quantization/test_quantizer.py` Adding e2e case in `tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_DeepSeek_W4A8DYNAMIC` to test deepseek w4a8_dynamic quantized model #### 1.How to get weights using Modelslim ##### Installation steps Use the branch master, the commit id is: 298e175d69b3b855111a1e09bbe2fcd12fdb4e24 git clone https://gitee.com/ascend/msit.git cd msit/msmodelslim bash install.sh ##### The required transformers environment transformers>=4.48.2 ##### Generate w4a8 weights cd /example/DeepSeek Command reference: msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md Execute the [pre-check](https://gitee.com/ascend/msit/blob/master/msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md#%E8%BF%90%E8%A1%8C%E5%89%8D%E5%BF%85%E6%A3%80) and [DeepSeek-R1 w4a8 mix quantization](https://gitee.com/ascend/msit/blob/master/msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md#deepseek-r1-w4a8-%E6%B7%B7%E5%90%88%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96%E5%89%8D%E4%B8%89%E5%B1%82-mlpw8a8-dynamic-%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96mla%E5%85%B1%E4%BA%AB%E4%B8%93%E5%AE%B6w8a8%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96%E8%B7%AF%E7%94%B1%E4%B8%93%E5%AE%B6w4a8-dynamic%E9%87%8F%E5%8C%96) chapter Reference command:python3 quant_deepseek_w4a8.py --model_path {Original weight path} --save_path {Generate weight path} --mindie_format ##### Adapt to vllm-ascend Since mindie_format generates mindie format, some adaptation modifications are needed for vllm-ascend to use it: `quant_model_description_w8a8_dynamic.json` rename to `quant_model_description.json`, and add `"group_size": 256` Modification in `config.json`:`"model_type":deepseekv2` is changed to `"model_type":deepseek_v3`; `quantization_config` is removed; tips:The group_size and weights match. If the w4a8 weights are not generated using msmodelslim, you can check the group_size in quantization_config in config.json. #### 2.How to run w4a8 ##### a.How to run eager mode export VLLM_USE_V1=1 # v1 python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=$1 --trust-remote-code -tp $2 -dp $3 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port $4 --max-model-len $5 --max-num-seqs $6 --enforce-eager eg: python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=/weightpath/w4a8_4_layer --trust-remote-code -tp 4 -dp 4 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port 8002 --max-model-len 5120 --max-num-seqs 128 --enforce-eager ##### b.How to run graph mode export VLLM_USE_V1=1 # v1 export HCCL_BUFFSIZE=1024 python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=$1 --trust-remote-code -tp $2 -dp $3 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port $4 --max-model-len $5 --additional_config='{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":true},"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true}}' eg: python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=/weight/dsr1_w4a8_vllm --trust-remote-code -tp 4 -dp 4 --enable_expert_parallel --quantization ascend --port 8002 --max-model-len 5120 --additional_config='{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":true},"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true}}' - vLLM version: v0.10.0 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/c494f96fbcf5e9f19f59e3dea6c2780aeb6c567f --------- Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
2025-08-06 10:17:44 +08:00
setattr(param, "quant_method",
FusedMoeWeightScaleSupported.GROUP.value)
def apply(
self,
layer: torch.nn.Module,
x: torch.Tensor,
router_logits: torch.Tensor,
[quantization] Support w8a8 quantization (#580) ### What this PR does / why we need it? Add a `VLLMAscendQuantizer` to support w8a8 static (W8A8) and dynamic on linear and moe (W8A8_DYNAMIC), the quantizer will be enable if a model has [quantize filed](https://huggingface.co/vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8/blob/main/config.json#L27). If MindIE Turbo is installed, the MindIE Turbo Quantizer will apply, otherwise will use VLLMAscendQuantizer directly. - This patch fix installation docs to make installation work - This patch enable norm quantization by patch `RMSNorm.__init__`, `RMSNorm.forward_oot`, `NPUModelRunnerBase.load_model` - Add `AscendW8A8LinearMethod` for W8A8 - Add `AscendW8A8DynamicLinearMethod` and `AscendW8A8DynamicFusedMoEMethod` for W8A8_DYNAMIC - Add a e2e test for `vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, support w8a8 quantization. After this patch supported, users can use below commands to run w8a8 models: ``` vllm serve /root/.cache/modelscope/hub/Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-w8a8 --served-model-name "qwen2.5-7B" ``` ### How was this patch tested? 0. CI passed: add e2e test for `vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8` 1. From @Yikun: I test Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8 for functional test all is well, pls refer to https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/580#issuecomment-2816747613 2. From @dingdingchaomian : Use qwen2.5-72b-instruct model and deepseek-v2-lite-chat tested, both models were quantized using Ascend's msmodelslim tool: - Qwen2.5-72b-instruct were tested twice, one for w8a8 static and one for w8a8 dynamic. - Deepseek-v2-lite-chat were tested once because its quantization used both static and dynamic w8a8. Models were tested using both off line inference and online serving, and both work well. The inference codes are exactly the same with the examples in https://vllm-ascend.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quick_start.html, with model path and tensor parallel number changed. --------- Signed-off-by: dingdingchaomian <wangce21@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dingdingchaomian <wangce21@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: Angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: liujiaxu <liujiaxu4@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: ApsarasX <apsarax@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: ganyi1996ppo <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
2025-04-20 18:14:05 +08:00
top_k: int,
renormalize: bool,
[quantization] Support w8a8 quantization (#580) ### What this PR does / why we need it? Add a `VLLMAscendQuantizer` to support w8a8 static (W8A8) and dynamic on linear and moe (W8A8_DYNAMIC), the quantizer will be enable if a model has [quantize filed](https://huggingface.co/vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8/blob/main/config.json#L27). If MindIE Turbo is installed, the MindIE Turbo Quantizer will apply, otherwise will use VLLMAscendQuantizer directly. - This patch fix installation docs to make installation work - This patch enable norm quantization by patch `RMSNorm.__init__`, `RMSNorm.forward_oot`, `NPUModelRunnerBase.load_model` - Add `AscendW8A8LinearMethod` for W8A8 - Add `AscendW8A8DynamicLinearMethod` and `AscendW8A8DynamicFusedMoEMethod` for W8A8_DYNAMIC - Add a e2e test for `vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, support w8a8 quantization. After this patch supported, users can use below commands to run w8a8 models: ``` vllm serve /root/.cache/modelscope/hub/Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-w8a8 --served-model-name "qwen2.5-7B" ``` ### How was this patch tested? 0. CI passed: add e2e test for `vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8` 1. From @Yikun: I test Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8 for functional test all is well, pls refer to https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/580#issuecomment-2816747613 2. From @dingdingchaomian : Use qwen2.5-72b-instruct model and deepseek-v2-lite-chat tested, both models were quantized using Ascend's msmodelslim tool: - Qwen2.5-72b-instruct were tested twice, one for w8a8 static and one for w8a8 dynamic. - Deepseek-v2-lite-chat were tested once because its quantization used both static and dynamic w8a8. Models were tested using both off line inference and online serving, and both work well. The inference codes are exactly the same with the examples in https://vllm-ascend.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quick_start.html, with model path and tensor parallel number changed. --------- Signed-off-by: dingdingchaomian <wangce21@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dingdingchaomian <wangce21@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: Angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: liujiaxu <liujiaxu4@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: ApsarasX <apsarax@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: ganyi1996ppo <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
2025-04-20 18:14:05 +08:00
use_grouped_topk: bool = False,
global_num_experts: int = -1,
expert_map: Optional[torch.Tensor] = None,
topk_group: Optional[int] = None,
num_expert_group: Optional[int] = None,
custom_routing_function: Optional[Callable] = None,
scoring_func: str = "softmax",
routed_scaling_factor: float = 1.0,
[quantization] Support w8a8 quantization (#580) ### What this PR does / why we need it? Add a `VLLMAscendQuantizer` to support w8a8 static (W8A8) and dynamic on linear and moe (W8A8_DYNAMIC), the quantizer will be enable if a model has [quantize filed](https://huggingface.co/vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8/blob/main/config.json#L27). If MindIE Turbo is installed, the MindIE Turbo Quantizer will apply, otherwise will use VLLMAscendQuantizer directly. - This patch fix installation docs to make installation work - This patch enable norm quantization by patch `RMSNorm.__init__`, `RMSNorm.forward_oot`, `NPUModelRunnerBase.load_model` - Add `AscendW8A8LinearMethod` for W8A8 - Add `AscendW8A8DynamicLinearMethod` and `AscendW8A8DynamicFusedMoEMethod` for W8A8_DYNAMIC - Add a e2e test for `vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, support w8a8 quantization. After this patch supported, users can use below commands to run w8a8 models: ``` vllm serve /root/.cache/modelscope/hub/Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-w8a8 --served-model-name "qwen2.5-7B" ``` ### How was this patch tested? 0. CI passed: add e2e test for `vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8` 1. From @Yikun: I test Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8 for functional test all is well, pls refer to https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/580#issuecomment-2816747613 2. From @dingdingchaomian : Use qwen2.5-72b-instruct model and deepseek-v2-lite-chat tested, both models were quantized using Ascend's msmodelslim tool: - Qwen2.5-72b-instruct were tested twice, one for w8a8 static and one for w8a8 dynamic. - Deepseek-v2-lite-chat were tested once because its quantization used both static and dynamic w8a8. Models were tested using both off line inference and online serving, and both work well. The inference codes are exactly the same with the examples in https://vllm-ascend.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quick_start.html, with model path and tensor parallel number changed. --------- Signed-off-by: dingdingchaomian <wangce21@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dingdingchaomian <wangce21@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: Angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: liujiaxu <liujiaxu4@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: ApsarasX <apsarax@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: ganyi1996ppo <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
2025-04-20 18:14:05 +08:00
e_score_correction_bias: Optional[torch.Tensor] = None,
is_prefill: bool = True,
enable_force_load_balance: bool = False,
log2phy: torch.Tensor = None,
global_redundant_expert_num=0,
[quantization] Support w8a8 quantization (#580) ### What this PR does / why we need it? Add a `VLLMAscendQuantizer` to support w8a8 static (W8A8) and dynamic on linear and moe (W8A8_DYNAMIC), the quantizer will be enable if a model has [quantize filed](https://huggingface.co/vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8/blob/main/config.json#L27). If MindIE Turbo is installed, the MindIE Turbo Quantizer will apply, otherwise will use VLLMAscendQuantizer directly. - This patch fix installation docs to make installation work - This patch enable norm quantization by patch `RMSNorm.__init__`, `RMSNorm.forward_oot`, `NPUModelRunnerBase.load_model` - Add `AscendW8A8LinearMethod` for W8A8 - Add `AscendW8A8DynamicLinearMethod` and `AscendW8A8DynamicFusedMoEMethod` for W8A8_DYNAMIC - Add a e2e test for `vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, support w8a8 quantization. After this patch supported, users can use below commands to run w8a8 models: ``` vllm serve /root/.cache/modelscope/hub/Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-w8a8 --served-model-name "qwen2.5-7B" ``` ### How was this patch tested? 0. CI passed: add e2e test for `vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8` 1. From @Yikun: I test Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-w8a8 for functional test all is well, pls refer to https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/580#issuecomment-2816747613 2. From @dingdingchaomian : Use qwen2.5-72b-instruct model and deepseek-v2-lite-chat tested, both models were quantized using Ascend's msmodelslim tool: - Qwen2.5-72b-instruct were tested twice, one for w8a8 static and one for w8a8 dynamic. - Deepseek-v2-lite-chat were tested once because its quantization used both static and dynamic w8a8. Models were tested using both off line inference and online serving, and both work well. The inference codes are exactly the same with the examples in https://vllm-ascend.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quick_start.html, with model path and tensor parallel number changed. --------- Signed-off-by: dingdingchaomian <wangce21@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dingdingchaomian <wangce21@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: Angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: liujiaxu <liujiaxu4@huawei.com> Co-authored-by: ApsarasX <apsarax@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: ganyi1996ppo <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
2025-04-20 18:14:05 +08:00
**kwargs,
) -> torch.Tensor:
return self.quant_method.apply(
layer, x, router_logits, top_k, renormalize, use_grouped_topk,
global_num_experts, expert_map, topk_group, num_expert_group,
custom_routing_function, scoring_func, routed_scaling_factor,
e_score_correction_bias, is_prefill, enable_force_load_balance,
log2phy, global_redundant_expert_num, **kwargs)
def process_weights_after_loading(self, layer: torch.nn.Module) -> None:
if hasattr(self.quant_method, "process_weights_after_loading"):
self.quant_method.process_weights_after_loading(layer)
def get_fused_moe_quant_config(self, layer: torch.nn.Module):
# TODO: implement this function
pass
[EPLB][refactor] Modification of the initialization logic for expert_map and log2phy(depend on pr5285) (#5311) ### What this PR does / why we need it? Unify the loading logic for expert_map and log2phy. 1. The map generated when enabling the redundancy expert is incorrect. The community generation map function only accepts the number of global experts. When we pass in the number of logical experts plus redundant experts, the local expert ID of the last card will index to an expert ID that does not exist. Now we ensure that the index points to a real existing expert ID, and each expert can be accessed. Moreover, when redundant experts are not enabled, the output of our function remains consistent with the community's function. 2. The map we generate is based on the length of the physical expert, but in reality, we only need to use the length of the logical expert. Later on, we will need to pad it accordingly, so we can simply generate a map with the length of the logical [expert.] 3. Unify the initialization logic across different scenarios and simplify the code for fused_moe. **Before refactoring** - map path is not None: expert map: get_rank_placement_map from _'expert_load_balancer.py'_, maintains the map for all ranks and all layers. log2phy: get_rank_log2phy_map from _'expert_load_balancer.py'_, maintains the map for all ranks and all layers. - map path is None: expert map: determine_expert_map from '_vllm.laye_r', The function does not support the redundant experts of vllm-ascend. log2phy: determine_default_log2phy_map from _'eplb_utils.py'_. The function does not support the redundant experts of vllm-ascend. **Refactoring** eplb_utils.py &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;init_eplb_config &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; generate placement &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; generate expert map &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; generate log2phy ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Expert Mapping Test Generation: ep size: 16, num of experts: 256, num of redundant experts: 16 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Expert Mapping (Non-1 indicates the expert responsible for this rank) for Rank 15: vllm map: [-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16] +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Improved map: [16 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15] Expert Mapping Test Generation: ep size: 16, num of experts: 256, num of redundant experts: 0 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Expert Mapping (Non-1 indicates the expert responsible for this rank) for Rank 15: vllm map: [-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15] +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Improved map: [-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15] dsr1 baselie: | dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-chat | |----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----| | gsm8k-lite | 7cd45e | accuracy | gen | 100.00 | dsr1 eplb: | dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-chat | |----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----| | gsm8k-lite | 7cd45e | accuracy | gen | 100.00 | - vLLM version: release/v0.13.0 - vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/5fbfa8d9ef15948599631baeb91e8220b2ee9bcc Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com> Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <1184188277@qq.com>
2025-12-29 09:26:14 +08:00
@property
def supports_eplb(self):
supports_eplb = getattr(self.quant_method, "supports_eplb", False)
return supports_eplb
class AscendEmbeddingMethod(AscendLinearMethod):
"""Embedding method for Ascend quantization.
Args:
quant_config: The Ascend quantization config.
"""
def __init__(self, quant_config: AscendQuantConfig, prefix: str,
packed_modules_mapping: Dict[str, Any],
layer: torch.nn.Module) -> None:
self.quant_method = get_quant_method(quant_config.quant_description,
prefix,
"linear",
packed_modules_mapping,
layer=layer)