[main] Fuse GroupedMatmul, Swiglu and DynamicQuant in `W8A8_DYNAMIC` quantized MoE layers (#2275)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fuse `GroupedMatmul`, `Swiglu` and `DynamicQuant` into one fusion
operation `GroupedMatmulSwigluQuant`.
1. extract common functions in `w4a8_dynamic.py` and `w8a8_dynamic.py`
2. if in supported occasion, use fusion operation
`npu_grouped_matmul_swiglu_quant`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Tested on W8A8 quantized Qwen3-235B-A22B model with `bs=16`
1. `tp=8`, `dp=1`, `moe_tp=8`, `moe_ep=1`, TPOP increased 21.54%, Output
Token Throughput increased 27.35%
<img width="3443" height="211" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a1a9c14d-2310-41be-9a03-36125dabae6e"
/>
3. `tp=8`, `dp=1`, `moe_tp=1`, `moe_ep=8`, TPOP increased 17.38%, Output
Token Throughput increased 6.86%
<img width="3443" height="211" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1ce92e92-720d-40c0-8b4d-c493e5cb10a6"
/>
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/6997a25ac65ed6cc3c2be6d09ca45f633a345f63
---------
Signed-off-by: Ruri <33858552+zhoux77899@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: zhoux77899 <zhouxiang100@huawei.com>
2025-09-04 11:37:32 +08:00
|
|
|
from unittest.mock import Mock, patch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import torch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from tests.ut.base import TestBase
|
2026-03-20 23:23:57 +08:00
|
|
|
from vllm_ascend.ascend_forward_context import MoECommType
|
|
|
|
|
from vllm_ascend.quantization.methods.w8a8_dynamic import AscendW8A8DynamicFusedMoEMethod
|
[main] Fuse GroupedMatmul, Swiglu and DynamicQuant in `W8A8_DYNAMIC` quantized MoE layers (#2275)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fuse `GroupedMatmul`, `Swiglu` and `DynamicQuant` into one fusion
operation `GroupedMatmulSwigluQuant`.
1. extract common functions in `w4a8_dynamic.py` and `w8a8_dynamic.py`
2. if in supported occasion, use fusion operation
`npu_grouped_matmul_swiglu_quant`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Tested on W8A8 quantized Qwen3-235B-A22B model with `bs=16`
1. `tp=8`, `dp=1`, `moe_tp=8`, `moe_ep=1`, TPOP increased 21.54%, Output
Token Throughput increased 27.35%
<img width="3443" height="211" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a1a9c14d-2310-41be-9a03-36125dabae6e"
/>
3. `tp=8`, `dp=1`, `moe_tp=1`, `moe_ep=8`, TPOP increased 17.38%, Output
Token Throughput increased 6.86%
<img width="3443" height="211" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1ce92e92-720d-40c0-8b4d-c493e5cb10a6"
/>
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/6997a25ac65ed6cc3c2be6d09ca45f633a345f63
---------
Signed-off-by: Ruri <33858552+zhoux77899@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: zhoux77899 <zhouxiang100@huawei.com>
2025-09-04 11:37:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestAscendW8A8FusedMoEMethod(TestBase):
|
|
|
|
|
num_experts = 8
|
|
|
|
|
hidden_size = 128
|
|
|
|
|
intermediate_size = 128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@patch("torch.distributed.get_rank")
|
[Refactor] Quantization Module Refactor (#5738)
### Summary
This PR refactors the `vllm_ascend/quantization` module to improve code
organization, maintainability, and extensibility. The refactoring
introduces a clear separation of concerns with a registry-based scheme
discovery pattern, abstract base classes for quantization schemes, and
dedicated wrapper classes.
### Key Changes
#### 1. **Modular Directory Structure**
| Before | After |
|--------|-------|
| Flat file structure with mixed responsibilities | Organized into
`methods/` subpackage for schemes |
| Single `quant_config.py` (600+ lines) | Separate config files:
`modelslim_config.py`, `compressed_tensors_config.py` |
| `utils.py` with scheme lookup logic | `methods/registry.py` with
decorator-based registration |
#### 2. **Registry-Based Scheme Discovery**
Replaced hardcoded `ASCEND_QUANTIZATION_METHOD_MAP` dictionary with a
decorator-based registry pattern:
```python
# Before: Manual dictionary mapping
ASCEND_QUANTIZATION_METHOD_MAP = {
"W8A8_DYNAMIC": {"linear": AscendW8A8DynamicLinearMethod, ...},
...
}
# After: Decorator-based registration
@register_scheme("W8A8_DYNAMIC", "linear")
class AscendW8A8DynamicLinearMethod(AscendLinearScheme):
...
```
#### 3. **Abstract Base Classes**
Introduced three abstract base classes in `methods/base.py`:
- `AscendLinearScheme` - Base for linear layer quantization
- `AscendMoEScheme` - Base for MoE layer quantization
- `AscendAttentionScheme` - Base for attention layer quantization
#### 4. **Separated Config and Wrapper Classes**
- **Config classes** (`AscendModelSlimConfig`,
`AscendCompressedTensorsConfig`): Handle config parsing and scheme
selection
- **Wrapper classes** (`AscendLinearMethod`, `AscendFusedMoEMethod`,
etc.): Implement vLLM interfaces and delegate to schemes
#### 5. **Cleaner Public API**
```python
# New clean module interface
from vllm_ascend.quantization import (
AscendModelSlimConfig,
AscendCompressedTensorsConfig,
)
from vllm_ascend.quantization.methods import get_scheme_class
```
### Architecture Diagram
```mermaid
classDiagram
direction TB
class QuantizationConfig {
<<vLLM Interface>>
+get_quant_method()
}
class AscendModelSlimConfig {
+quant_description
+get_quant_method()
-create_scheme_for_layer()
}
class AscendCompressedTensorsConfig {
+target_scheme_map
+get_quant_method()
-_get_scheme_from_parts()
}
class AscendLinearMethod {
<<Wrapper>>
+quant_method: AscendLinearScheme
+create_weights()
+apply()
}
class AscendFusedMoEMethod {
<<Wrapper>>
+quant_method: AscendMoEScheme
+create_weights()
+apply()
}
class AscendLinearScheme {
<<Abstract>>
+get_weight()*
+apply()*
+get_pertensor_param()
+get_perchannel_param()
}
class AscendMoEScheme {
<<Abstract>>
+get_weight()*
+get_dynamic_quant_param()*
+apply()*
}
class W8A8DynamicLinear {
+get_weight()
+apply()
}
class W8A8DynamicMoE {
+get_weight()
+apply()
}
QuantizationConfig <|-- AscendModelSlimConfig
QuantizationConfig <|-- AscendCompressedTensorsConfig
AscendModelSlimConfig ..> AscendLinearMethod : creates
AscendModelSlimConfig ..> AscendFusedMoEMethod : creates
AscendCompressedTensorsConfig ..> AscendLinearMethod : creates
AscendCompressedTensorsConfig ..> AscendFusedMoEMethod : creates
AscendLinearMethod o-- AscendLinearScheme : delegates to
AscendFusedMoEMethod o-- AscendMoEScheme : delegates to
AscendLinearScheme <|-- W8A8DynamicLinear
AscendMoEScheme <|-- W8A8DynamicMoE
```
### Scheme Registration Flow
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant Module as Scheme Module
participant Registry as _SCHEME_REGISTRY
participant Config as QuantConfig
participant Wrapper as Wrapper Class
Note over Module: At import time
Module->>Registry: @register_scheme("W8A8_DYNAMIC", "linear")
Registry->>Registry: Store (quant_type, layer_type) -> Class
Note over Config: At runtime
Config->>Config: Determine quant_type from description
Config->>Registry: get_scheme_class(quant_type, layer_type)
Registry-->>Config: Return scheme class
Config->>Config: scheme = scheme_cls()
Config->>Wrapper: Create wrapper with scheme
Wrapper-->>Config: Return wrapper instance
```
### File Changes Summary
| Original Files | Refactored Files |
|----------------|------------------|
| `__init__.py` (empty) | `__init__.py` (exports public API) |
| `quant_config.py` | `modelslim_config.py` + `wrappers.py` |
| `compressed_tensors/` | `compressed_tensors_config.py` |
| `utils.py` | `methods/registry.py` |
| `w8a8_dynamic.py` | `methods/w8a8_dynamic.py` |
| `w8a8.py` | `methods/w8a8_static.py` |
| `w4a4_flatquant_dynamic.py` | `methods/w4a4_flatquant.py` |
| ... | `methods/base.py` (new) |
### Benefits
1. **Extensibility**: Adding new quantization schemes only requires
implementing the base class and adding `@register_scheme` decorator
2. **Maintainability**: Clear separation between config parsing, wrapper
logic, and scheme implementation
3. **Testability**: Abstract base classes enable easier unit testing and
mocking
4. **Discoverability**: Registry pattern makes it easy to list all
supported schemes
5. **Reduced Coupling**: Config classes no longer need to know about all
scheme implementations
___
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/2f4e6548efec402b913ffddc8726230d9311948d
---------
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
2026-01-23 14:13:47 +08:00
|
|
|
@patch("vllm_ascend.quantization.methods.w8a8_dynamic.get_mc2_group")
|
|
|
|
|
@patch("vllm_ascend.quantization.methods.w8a8_dynamic.get_ascend_config")
|
|
|
|
|
@patch("vllm_ascend.quantization.methods.w8a8_dynamic.get_ep_group")
|
[main] Fuse GroupedMatmul, Swiglu and DynamicQuant in `W8A8_DYNAMIC` quantized MoE layers (#2275)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fuse `GroupedMatmul`, `Swiglu` and `DynamicQuant` into one fusion
operation `GroupedMatmulSwigluQuant`.
1. extract common functions in `w4a8_dynamic.py` and `w8a8_dynamic.py`
2. if in supported occasion, use fusion operation
`npu_grouped_matmul_swiglu_quant`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Tested on W8A8 quantized Qwen3-235B-A22B model with `bs=16`
1. `tp=8`, `dp=1`, `moe_tp=8`, `moe_ep=1`, TPOP increased 21.54%, Output
Token Throughput increased 27.35%
<img width="3443" height="211" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a1a9c14d-2310-41be-9a03-36125dabae6e"
/>
3. `tp=8`, `dp=1`, `moe_tp=1`, `moe_ep=8`, TPOP increased 17.38%, Output
Token Throughput increased 6.86%
<img width="3443" height="211" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1ce92e92-720d-40c0-8b4d-c493e5cb10a6"
/>
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/6997a25ac65ed6cc3c2be6d09ca45f633a345f63
---------
Signed-off-by: Ruri <33858552+zhoux77899@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: zhoux77899 <zhouxiang100@huawei.com>
2025-09-04 11:37:32 +08:00
|
|
|
def setUp(self, mock_get_ep_group, mock_get_ascend_config,
|
|
|
|
|
mock_get_mc2_group, mock_get_rank):
|
2025-09-07 10:31:32 +08:00
|
|
|
with patch(
|
[Refactor] Quantization Module Refactor (#5738)
### Summary
This PR refactors the `vllm_ascend/quantization` module to improve code
organization, maintainability, and extensibility. The refactoring
introduces a clear separation of concerns with a registry-based scheme
discovery pattern, abstract base classes for quantization schemes, and
dedicated wrapper classes.
### Key Changes
#### 1. **Modular Directory Structure**
| Before | After |
|--------|-------|
| Flat file structure with mixed responsibilities | Organized into
`methods/` subpackage for schemes |
| Single `quant_config.py` (600+ lines) | Separate config files:
`modelslim_config.py`, `compressed_tensors_config.py` |
| `utils.py` with scheme lookup logic | `methods/registry.py` with
decorator-based registration |
#### 2. **Registry-Based Scheme Discovery**
Replaced hardcoded `ASCEND_QUANTIZATION_METHOD_MAP` dictionary with a
decorator-based registry pattern:
```python
# Before: Manual dictionary mapping
ASCEND_QUANTIZATION_METHOD_MAP = {
"W8A8_DYNAMIC": {"linear": AscendW8A8DynamicLinearMethod, ...},
...
}
# After: Decorator-based registration
@register_scheme("W8A8_DYNAMIC", "linear")
class AscendW8A8DynamicLinearMethod(AscendLinearScheme):
...
```
#### 3. **Abstract Base Classes**
Introduced three abstract base classes in `methods/base.py`:
- `AscendLinearScheme` - Base for linear layer quantization
- `AscendMoEScheme` - Base for MoE layer quantization
- `AscendAttentionScheme` - Base for attention layer quantization
#### 4. **Separated Config and Wrapper Classes**
- **Config classes** (`AscendModelSlimConfig`,
`AscendCompressedTensorsConfig`): Handle config parsing and scheme
selection
- **Wrapper classes** (`AscendLinearMethod`, `AscendFusedMoEMethod`,
etc.): Implement vLLM interfaces and delegate to schemes
#### 5. **Cleaner Public API**
```python
# New clean module interface
from vllm_ascend.quantization import (
AscendModelSlimConfig,
AscendCompressedTensorsConfig,
)
from vllm_ascend.quantization.methods import get_scheme_class
```
### Architecture Diagram
```mermaid
classDiagram
direction TB
class QuantizationConfig {
<<vLLM Interface>>
+get_quant_method()
}
class AscendModelSlimConfig {
+quant_description
+get_quant_method()
-create_scheme_for_layer()
}
class AscendCompressedTensorsConfig {
+target_scheme_map
+get_quant_method()
-_get_scheme_from_parts()
}
class AscendLinearMethod {
<<Wrapper>>
+quant_method: AscendLinearScheme
+create_weights()
+apply()
}
class AscendFusedMoEMethod {
<<Wrapper>>
+quant_method: AscendMoEScheme
+create_weights()
+apply()
}
class AscendLinearScheme {
<<Abstract>>
+get_weight()*
+apply()*
+get_pertensor_param()
+get_perchannel_param()
}
class AscendMoEScheme {
<<Abstract>>
+get_weight()*
+get_dynamic_quant_param()*
+apply()*
}
class W8A8DynamicLinear {
+get_weight()
+apply()
}
class W8A8DynamicMoE {
+get_weight()
+apply()
}
QuantizationConfig <|-- AscendModelSlimConfig
QuantizationConfig <|-- AscendCompressedTensorsConfig
AscendModelSlimConfig ..> AscendLinearMethod : creates
AscendModelSlimConfig ..> AscendFusedMoEMethod : creates
AscendCompressedTensorsConfig ..> AscendLinearMethod : creates
AscendCompressedTensorsConfig ..> AscendFusedMoEMethod : creates
AscendLinearMethod o-- AscendLinearScheme : delegates to
AscendFusedMoEMethod o-- AscendMoEScheme : delegates to
AscendLinearScheme <|-- W8A8DynamicLinear
AscendMoEScheme <|-- W8A8DynamicMoE
```
### Scheme Registration Flow
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant Module as Scheme Module
participant Registry as _SCHEME_REGISTRY
participant Config as QuantConfig
participant Wrapper as Wrapper Class
Note over Module: At import time
Module->>Registry: @register_scheme("W8A8_DYNAMIC", "linear")
Registry->>Registry: Store (quant_type, layer_type) -> Class
Note over Config: At runtime
Config->>Config: Determine quant_type from description
Config->>Registry: get_scheme_class(quant_type, layer_type)
Registry-->>Config: Return scheme class
Config->>Config: scheme = scheme_cls()
Config->>Wrapper: Create wrapper with scheme
Wrapper-->>Config: Return wrapper instance
```
### File Changes Summary
| Original Files | Refactored Files |
|----------------|------------------|
| `__init__.py` (empty) | `__init__.py` (exports public API) |
| `quant_config.py` | `modelslim_config.py` + `wrappers.py` |
| `compressed_tensors/` | `compressed_tensors_config.py` |
| `utils.py` | `methods/registry.py` |
| `w8a8_dynamic.py` | `methods/w8a8_dynamic.py` |
| `w8a8.py` | `methods/w8a8_static.py` |
| `w4a4_flatquant_dynamic.py` | `methods/w4a4_flatquant.py` |
| ... | `methods/base.py` (new) |
### Benefits
1. **Extensibility**: Adding new quantization schemes only requires
implementing the base class and adding `@register_scheme` decorator
2. **Maintainability**: Clear separation between config parsing, wrapper
logic, and scheme implementation
3. **Testability**: Abstract base classes enable easier unit testing and
mocking
4. **Discoverability**: Registry pattern makes it easy to list all
supported schemes
5. **Reduced Coupling**: Config classes no longer need to know about all
scheme implementations
___
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/2f4e6548efec402b913ffddc8726230d9311948d
---------
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
2026-01-23 14:13:47 +08:00
|
|
|
'vllm_ascend.quantization.methods.w8a8_dynamic.get_current_vllm_config'
|
2025-09-07 10:31:32 +08:00
|
|
|
) as mock_get_current_vllm_config:
|
|
|
|
|
mock_vllm_config = Mock()
|
|
|
|
|
mock_vllm_config.quant_config = Mock(
|
|
|
|
|
quant_description={"group_size": 256})
|
|
|
|
|
mock_vllm_config.scheduler_config = Mock(
|
|
|
|
|
max_num_batched_tokens=2048,
|
|
|
|
|
max_model_len=2048,
|
|
|
|
|
enable_chunked_prefill=False)
|
|
|
|
|
mock_get_current_vllm_config.return_value = mock_vllm_config
|
|
|
|
|
mock_ep_group = Mock()
|
|
|
|
|
mock_get_ep_group.return_value = mock_ep_group
|
|
|
|
|
mock_ascend_config = Mock()
|
|
|
|
|
mock_ascend_config.enable_chunked_prefill = False
|
2026-03-20 23:23:57 +08:00
|
|
|
mock_ascend_config.multistream_overlap_gate = False
|
|
|
|
|
mock_ascend_config.eplb_config = Mock(dynamic_eplb=False)
|
2025-09-07 10:31:32 +08:00
|
|
|
mock_get_ascend_config.return_value = mock_ascend_config
|
|
|
|
|
mock_mc2_group = Mock(device_group=0)
|
|
|
|
|
mock_get_mc2_group.return_value = mock_mc2_group
|
|
|
|
|
mock_rank = Mock()
|
|
|
|
|
mock_get_rank.return_value = mock_rank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.quant_method = AscendW8A8DynamicFusedMoEMethod()
|
[main] Fuse GroupedMatmul, Swiglu and DynamicQuant in `W8A8_DYNAMIC` quantized MoE layers (#2275)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fuse `GroupedMatmul`, `Swiglu` and `DynamicQuant` into one fusion
operation `GroupedMatmulSwigluQuant`.
1. extract common functions in `w4a8_dynamic.py` and `w8a8_dynamic.py`
2. if in supported occasion, use fusion operation
`npu_grouped_matmul_swiglu_quant`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Tested on W8A8 quantized Qwen3-235B-A22B model with `bs=16`
1. `tp=8`, `dp=1`, `moe_tp=8`, `moe_ep=1`, TPOP increased 21.54%, Output
Token Throughput increased 27.35%
<img width="3443" height="211" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a1a9c14d-2310-41be-9a03-36125dabae6e"
/>
3. `tp=8`, `dp=1`, `moe_tp=1`, `moe_ep=8`, TPOP increased 17.38%, Output
Token Throughput increased 6.86%
<img width="3443" height="211" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1ce92e92-720d-40c0-8b4d-c493e5cb10a6"
/>
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/6997a25ac65ed6cc3c2be6d09ca45f633a345f63
---------
Signed-off-by: Ruri <33858552+zhoux77899@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: zhoux77899 <zhouxiang100@huawei.com>
2025-09-04 11:37:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_get_weight(self):
|
|
|
|
|
param_dict = self.quant_method.get_weight(self.num_experts,
|
|
|
|
|
self.intermediate_size,
|
|
|
|
|
self.hidden_size,
|
|
|
|
|
torch.bfloat16)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(param_dict["w13_weight"].dtype, torch.int8)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
|
param_dict["w13_weight"].shape,
|
|
|
|
|
(self.num_experts, 2 * self.intermediate_size, self.hidden_size))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_get_dynamic_quant_param(self):
|
|
|
|
|
param_dict = self.quant_method.get_dynamic_quant_param(
|
|
|
|
|
self.num_experts, self.intermediate_size, self.hidden_size,
|
|
|
|
|
torch.bfloat16)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(param_dict["w13_weight_scale"].dtype, torch.bfloat16)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(param_dict["w13_weight_scale"].shape,
|
|
|
|
|
(self.num_experts, 2 * self.intermediate_size, 1))
|
2025-12-22 17:45:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def build_layer(self):
|
|
|
|
|
layer = torch.nn.Module()
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w13_weight = torch.nn.Parameter(torch.empty(
|
|
|
|
|
self.num_experts,
|
|
|
|
|
2 * self.intermediate_size,
|
|
|
|
|
self.hidden_size,
|
|
|
|
|
dtype=torch.int8),
|
|
|
|
|
requires_grad=False)
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w2_weight = torch.nn.Parameter(torch.empty(
|
|
|
|
|
self.num_experts,
|
|
|
|
|
self.hidden_size,
|
|
|
|
|
self.intermediate_size,
|
|
|
|
|
dtype=torch.int8),
|
|
|
|
|
requires_grad=False)
|
|
|
|
|
w13_weight_scale = torch.zeros(
|
|
|
|
|
(self.num_experts, 2 * self.intermediate_size, 1),
|
|
|
|
|
dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w13_weight_scale = torch.nn.Parameter(w13_weight_scale,
|
|
|
|
|
requires_grad=False)
|
|
|
|
|
w13_weight_offset = torch.zeros(
|
|
|
|
|
(self.num_experts, 2 * self.intermediate_size, 1),
|
|
|
|
|
dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w13_weight_offset = torch.nn.Parameter(w13_weight_offset,
|
|
|
|
|
requires_grad=False)
|
|
|
|
|
w2_weight_scale = torch.zeros((self.num_experts, self.hidden_size, 1),
|
|
|
|
|
dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w2_weight_scale = torch.nn.Parameter(w2_weight_scale,
|
|
|
|
|
requires_grad=False)
|
|
|
|
|
w2_weight_offset = torch.zeros((self.num_experts, self.hidden_size, 1),
|
|
|
|
|
dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w2_weight_offset = torch.nn.Parameter(w2_weight_offset,
|
|
|
|
|
requires_grad=False)
|
|
|
|
|
return layer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@patch('torch_npu.npu_format_cast')
|
|
|
|
|
def test_process_weights_after_loading(self, mock_npu_format_cast):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def func_by_args(weight, num_format):
|
|
|
|
|
return weight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mock_npu_format_cast.side_effect = func_by_args
|
|
|
|
|
new_layer = self.build_layer()
|
|
|
|
|
self.quant_method.process_weights_after_loading(new_layer)
|
|
|
|
|
mock_npu_format_cast.assert_called()
|
2026-03-20 23:23:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@patch("vllm_ascend.quantization.methods.w8a8_dynamic._EXTRA_CTX")
|
|
|
|
|
@patch("vllm_ascend.quantization.methods.w8a8_dynamic.select_experts")
|
|
|
|
|
def test_apply_uses_explicit_dispatch_and_mlp_args(self, mock_select_experts, mock_extra_ctx):
|
|
|
|
|
tokens = 4
|
|
|
|
|
hidden_size = self.hidden_size
|
|
|
|
|
layer = torch.nn.Module()
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w13_weight = torch.randint(
|
|
|
|
|
-8,
|
|
|
|
|
8,
|
|
|
|
|
(self.num_experts, 2 * self.intermediate_size, hidden_size),
|
|
|
|
|
dtype=torch.int8,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w2_weight = torch.randint(
|
|
|
|
|
-8,
|
|
|
|
|
8,
|
|
|
|
|
(self.num_experts, hidden_size, self.intermediate_size),
|
|
|
|
|
dtype=torch.int8,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w13_weight_scale_fp32 = torch.ones(self.num_experts, 2 * self.intermediate_size, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w2_weight_scale = torch.ones(self.num_experts, hidden_size, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x = torch.randn(tokens, hidden_size, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
router_logits = torch.randn(tokens, self.num_experts, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
topk_weights = torch.randn(tokens, 2, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
topk_ids = torch.randint(0, self.num_experts, (tokens, 2), dtype=torch.int64)
|
|
|
|
|
mc2_mask = torch.tensor([1, 0, 1, 0], dtype=torch.bool)
|
|
|
|
|
pertoken_scale = torch.randn(tokens, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mock_select_experts.return_value = (topk_weights, topk_ids)
|
|
|
|
|
mock_comm = Mock()
|
|
|
|
|
mock_comm.fused_experts.return_value = torch.randn(tokens, hidden_size, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
mock_extra_ctx.moe_comm_method = mock_comm
|
|
|
|
|
mock_extra_ctx.moe_comm_type = MoECommType.ALLGATHER
|
|
|
|
|
self.quant_method.multistream_overlap_gate = False
|
|
|
|
|
self.quant_method.in_dtype = torch.float32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.quant_method.apply(
|
|
|
|
|
layer=layer,
|
|
|
|
|
x=x,
|
|
|
|
|
router_logits=router_logits,
|
|
|
|
|
top_k=2,
|
|
|
|
|
renormalize=True,
|
|
|
|
|
global_num_experts=self.num_experts,
|
|
|
|
|
activation="gelu",
|
|
|
|
|
apply_router_weight_on_input=True,
|
|
|
|
|
mc2_mask=mc2_mask,
|
|
|
|
|
pertoken_scale=pertoken_scale,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fused_experts_input = mock_comm.fused_experts.call_args.kwargs["fused_experts_input"]
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(fused_experts_input.activation, "gelu")
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(fused_experts_input.routing.apply_router_weight_on_input)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIs(fused_experts_input.routing.mc2_mask, mc2_mask)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIs(fused_experts_input.routing.pertoken_scale, pertoken_scale)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIs(fused_experts_input.topk_weights, topk_weights)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIs(fused_experts_input.topk_ids, topk_ids)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@patch("vllm_ascend.quantization.methods.w8a8_dynamic.get_flash_common3_context")
|
|
|
|
|
@patch("vllm_ascend.quantization.methods.w8a8_dynamic._EXTRA_CTX")
|
|
|
|
|
@patch("vllm_ascend.quantization.methods.w8a8_dynamic.select_experts")
|
|
|
|
|
def test_apply_overlap_gate_uses_fc3_context(
|
|
|
|
|
self,
|
|
|
|
|
mock_select_experts,
|
|
|
|
|
mock_extra_ctx,
|
|
|
|
|
mock_get_flash_common3_context,
|
|
|
|
|
):
|
|
|
|
|
tokens = 4
|
|
|
|
|
hidden_size = self.hidden_size
|
|
|
|
|
layer = torch.nn.Module()
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w13_weight = torch.randint(
|
|
|
|
|
-8,
|
|
|
|
|
8,
|
|
|
|
|
(self.num_experts, 2 * self.intermediate_size, hidden_size),
|
|
|
|
|
dtype=torch.int8,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w2_weight = torch.randint(
|
|
|
|
|
-8,
|
|
|
|
|
8,
|
|
|
|
|
(self.num_experts, hidden_size, self.intermediate_size),
|
|
|
|
|
dtype=torch.int8,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w13_weight_scale_fp32 = torch.ones(self.num_experts, 2 * self.intermediate_size, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
layer.w2_weight_scale = torch.ones(self.num_experts, hidden_size, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x = torch.randn(tokens, hidden_size, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
router_logits = torch.randn(tokens, self.num_experts, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
topk_weights = torch.randn(tokens, 2, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
topk_ids = torch.randint(0, self.num_experts, (tokens, 2), dtype=torch.int64)
|
|
|
|
|
mc2_mask = torch.tensor([1, 0, 1, 0], dtype=torch.bool)
|
|
|
|
|
pertoken_scale = torch.randn(tokens, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.quant_method.multistream_overlap_gate = True
|
|
|
|
|
self.quant_method.in_dtype = torch.float32
|
|
|
|
|
mock_get_flash_common3_context.return_value = Mock(topk_weights=topk_weights, topk_ids=topk_ids)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mock_comm = Mock()
|
|
|
|
|
mock_comm.fused_experts.return_value = torch.randn(tokens, hidden_size, dtype=torch.float32)
|
|
|
|
|
mock_extra_ctx.moe_comm_method = mock_comm
|
|
|
|
|
mock_extra_ctx.moe_comm_type = MoECommType.ALLGATHER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.quant_method.apply(
|
|
|
|
|
layer=layer,
|
|
|
|
|
x=x,
|
|
|
|
|
router_logits=router_logits,
|
|
|
|
|
top_k=2,
|
|
|
|
|
renormalize=True,
|
|
|
|
|
global_num_experts=self.num_experts,
|
|
|
|
|
activation="gelu",
|
|
|
|
|
apply_router_weight_on_input=True,
|
|
|
|
|
mc2_mask=mc2_mask,
|
|
|
|
|
pertoken_scale=pertoken_scale,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mock_select_experts.assert_not_called()
|
|
|
|
|
fused_experts_input = mock_comm.fused_experts.call_args.kwargs["fused_experts_input"]
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(fused_experts_input.activation, "gelu")
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(fused_experts_input.routing.apply_router_weight_on_input)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIs(fused_experts_input.routing.mc2_mask, mc2_mask)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIs(fused_experts_input.routing.pertoken_scale, pertoken_scale)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIs(fused_experts_input.topk_weights, topk_weights)
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertIs(fused_experts_input.topk_ids, topk_ids)
|