init
This commit is contained in:
126
transformers/examples/legacy/question-answering/README.md
Normal file
126
transformers/examples/legacy/question-answering/README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
|
||||
#### Fine-tuning BERT on SQuAD1.0 with relative position embeddings
|
||||
|
||||
The following examples show how to fine-tune BERT models with different relative position embeddings. The BERT model
|
||||
`google-bert/bert-base-uncased` was pretrained with default absolute position embeddings. We provide the following pretrained
|
||||
models which were pre-trained on the same training data (BooksCorpus and English Wikipedia) as in the BERT model
|
||||
training, but with different relative position embeddings.
|
||||
|
||||
* `zhiheng-huang/bert-base-uncased-embedding-relative-key`, trained from scratch with relative embedding proposed by
|
||||
Shaw et al., [Self-Attention with Relative Position Representations](https://huggingface.co/papers/1803.02155)
|
||||
* `zhiheng-huang/bert-base-uncased-embedding-relative-key-query`, trained from scratch with relative embedding method 4
|
||||
in Huang et al. [Improve Transformer Models with Better Relative Position Embeddings](https://huggingface.co/papers/2009.13658)
|
||||
* `zhiheng-huang/bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking-embedding-relative-key-query`, fine-tuned from model
|
||||
`google-bert/bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking` with 3 additional epochs with relative embedding method 4 in Huang et al.
|
||||
[Improve Transformer Models with Better Relative Position Embeddings](https://huggingface.co/papers/2009.13658)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
##### Base models fine-tuning
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
export CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7
|
||||
torchrun --nproc_per_node=8 ./examples/question-answering/run_squad.py \
|
||||
--model_name_or_path zhiheng-huang/bert-base-uncased-embedding-relative-key-query \
|
||||
--dataset_name squad \
|
||||
--do_train \
|
||||
--do_eval \
|
||||
--learning_rate 3e-5 \
|
||||
--num_train_epochs 2 \
|
||||
--max_seq_length 512 \
|
||||
--doc_stride 128 \
|
||||
--output_dir relative_squad \
|
||||
--per_device_eval_batch_size=60 \
|
||||
--per_device_train_batch_size=6
|
||||
```
|
||||
Training with the above command leads to the following results. It boosts the BERT default from f1 score of 88.52 to 90.54.
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
'exact': 83.6802270577105, 'f1': 90.54772098174814
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The change of `max_seq_length` from 512 to 384 in the above command leads to the f1 score of 90.34. Replacing the above
|
||||
model `zhiheng-huang/bert-base-uncased-embedding-relative-key-query` with
|
||||
`zhiheng-huang/bert-base-uncased-embedding-relative-key` leads to the f1 score of 89.51. The changing of 8 gpus to one
|
||||
gpu training leads to the f1 score of 90.71.
|
||||
|
||||
##### Large models fine-tuning
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
export CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7
|
||||
torchrun --nproc_per_node=8 ./examples/question-answering/run_squad.py \
|
||||
--model_name_or_path zhiheng-huang/bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking-embedding-relative-key-query \
|
||||
--dataset_name squad \
|
||||
--do_train \
|
||||
--do_eval \
|
||||
--learning_rate 3e-5 \
|
||||
--num_train_epochs 2 \
|
||||
--max_seq_length 512 \
|
||||
--doc_stride 128 \
|
||||
--output_dir relative_squad \
|
||||
--per_gpu_eval_batch_size=6 \
|
||||
--per_gpu_train_batch_size=2 \
|
||||
--gradient_accumulation_steps 3
|
||||
```
|
||||
Training with the above command leads to the f1 score of 93.52, which is slightly better than the f1 score of 93.15 for
|
||||
`google-bert/bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking`.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Distributed training
|
||||
|
||||
Here is an example using distributed training on 8 V100 GPUs and Bert Whole Word Masking uncased model to reach a F1 > 93 on SQuAD1.1:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
torchrun --nproc_per_node=8 ./examples/question-answering/run_squad.py \
|
||||
--model_name_or_path google-bert/bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking \
|
||||
--dataset_name squad \
|
||||
--do_train \
|
||||
--do_eval \
|
||||
--learning_rate 3e-5 \
|
||||
--num_train_epochs 2 \
|
||||
--max_seq_length 384 \
|
||||
--doc_stride 128 \
|
||||
--output_dir ./examples/models/wwm_uncased_finetuned_squad/ \
|
||||
--per_device_eval_batch_size=3 \
|
||||
--per_device_train_batch_size=3 \
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Training with the previously defined hyper-parameters yields the following results:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
f1 = 93.15
|
||||
exact_match = 86.91
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This fine-tuned model is available as a checkpoint under the reference
|
||||
[`google-bert/bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking-finetuned-squad`](https://huggingface.co/google-bert/bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking-finetuned-squad).
|
||||
|
||||
## Results
|
||||
|
||||
Larger batch size may improve the performance while costing more memory.
|
||||
|
||||
##### Results for SQuAD1.0 with the previously defined hyper-parameters:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
{
|
||||
"exact": 85.45884578997162,
|
||||
"f1": 92.5974600601065,
|
||||
"total": 10570,
|
||||
"HasAns_exact": 85.45884578997162,
|
||||
"HasAns_f1": 92.59746006010651,
|
||||
"HasAns_total": 10570
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
##### Results for SQuAD2.0 with the previously defined hyper-parameters:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
{
|
||||
"exact": 80.4177545691906,
|
||||
"f1": 84.07154997729623,
|
||||
"total": 11873,
|
||||
"HasAns_exact": 76.73751686909581,
|
||||
"HasAns_f1": 84.05558584352873,
|
||||
"HasAns_total": 5928,
|
||||
"NoAns_exact": 84.0874684608915,
|
||||
"NoAns_f1": 84.0874684608915,
|
||||
"NoAns_total": 5945
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user